Datasets:
prompt stringlengths 259 1.58k | chosen stringlengths 234 1.26k | rejected stringlengths 256 1.36k | source stringclasses 6
values |
|---|---|---|---|
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:37:56 +0100
Sender: Karsten Bräckelmann <qmitxmeh@rudersport.de>
Receiver: zqoqi@spamassassin.apache.org
Email Subject: Re: --max-children setting, consider raising it
Email Body: On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 12:09 -0800, fchan wrote:
Hello,
I thought ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Karsten Bräckelmann <qmitxmeh@rudersport.de>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'rudersport.de' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sendi... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Karsten Bräckelmann <qmitxmeh@rudersport.de>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:22:52 -0400
Sender: rkevinburton@charter.net
Receiver: hadley wickham <h.wickham@gmail.com>
Email Subject: Re: [R] RESHAPE cast help.
Email Body: Thank you for your help. Now let me really show my ignorance. How do I iterate through this data fram... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'rkevinburton@charter.net' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with th... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('rkevinburton@charter.net') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:19:56 -0800
Sender: Robert - elists <ahitv20@abbacomm.net>
Receiver: zqoqi@spamassassin.apache.org
Email Subject: RE: some custom ruleset rule info please
Email Body: Not with any 3.x version.
guenther
:-)
Oops, my fault... I missed that ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Robert - elists <ahitv20@abbacomm.net>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the visible Fr... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Robert - elists <ahitv20@abbacomm.net>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:02:40 +0200
Sender: Rafael Garcia-Suarez <pvhuhqgncrxnu@gmail.com>
Receiver: "Jerry D. Hedden" <drbcqzxl@cpan.org>
Email Subject: Re: [PATCH] pp_int should treat refs as UVs (not IVs)
Email Body: On 11/10/2007, Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
This is a t... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Rafael Garcia-Suarez <pvhuhqgncrxnu@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Rafael Garcia-Suarez <pvhuhqgncrxnu@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:13:46 -0400
Sender: Daily Top 10 <ltoinnin_2004@mont.be>
Receiver: user7-ext2@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: CNN.com Daily Top 10
Email Body: THE DAILY TOP 10 from CNN.com Top videos and stories as of: Aug 1, 2008 3:58 PM EDT TOP 10 VIDEO... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Daily Top 10 <ltoinnin_2004@mont.be>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'mont.be', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:52:10 +0900
Sender: Daily Top 10 <tnat^ah1964@youronlive.com>
Receiver: user6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: CNN.com Daily Top 10
Email Body: THE DAILY TOP 10 from CNN.com Top videos and stories as of: Aug 1, 2008 3:58 PM EDT TOP 10 VIDEO... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Daily Top 10 <tnat^ah1964@youronlive.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attac... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'youronlive.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:36:30 +0530
Sender: Anand Balachandran Pillai <crsxanpl@gmail.com>
Receiver: Jim Jewett <zuhbosedru@gmail.com>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] 2.6 and 3.0 project management
Email Body: On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jim Jewett wr... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Anand Balachandran Pillai <crsxanpl@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Anand Balachandran Pillai <crsxanpl@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:20:52 +0100
Sender: Rafael Garcia-Suarez <pvhuhqgncrxnu@gmail.com>
Receiver: "John E. Malmberg" <ho0ebg@qsl.net>
Email Subject: Re: patch@23206 Always expose vms_realpath and vms_case_tolerant routines.
Email Body: Could we postpone this change fo... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Rafael Garcia-Suarez <pvhuhqgncrxnu@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Rafael Garcia-Suarez <pvhuhqgncrxnu@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:42:33 +0000
Sender: Andy Armstrong <kngf@hexten.net>
Receiver: gbl@iki.fi
Email Subject: Re: RC1 uploaded to PAUSE, and indexing problems
Email Body: On 18 Nov 2007, at 13:37, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
I've got a PPC Mac powered off with some Leop... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Andy Armstrong <kngf@hexten.net>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Andy Armstrong <kngf@hexten.net>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:18:17 -0700
Sender: Chris Ledet <hfsvhhhyadi.fnjws@gmail.com>
Receiver: PownceAPI <zgdjhgesv@googlegroups.com>
Email Subject: [PownceAPI] Re: OAuth Support Incomplete?
Email Body: Adam,
For my Ruby class, I've been using the http basic authentica... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Chris Ledet <hfsvhhhyadi.fnjws@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Chris Ledet <hfsvhhhyadi.fnjws@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:15:04 +0530
Sender: Agnello George <nydnuik.hhtbfx@gmail.com>
Receiver: zqoqi@spamassassin.apache.org
Email Subject: spamd: checking message..........for(unknown):500
Email Body: I have smatermail connecting to my remote system by startin spamd as... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Agnello George <nydnuik.hhtbfx@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Agnello George <nydnuik.hhtbfx@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:48:57 +0000
Sender: "SearchWinIT.com" <vmnvhaovocw@lists.techtarget.com>
Receiver: user6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: New White Paper: Diskless PCs and the next wave of centralized computing
Email Body: Dear SearchWinIT.com member,
The ch... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"SearchWinIT.com" <vmnvhaovocw@lists.techtarget.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'lists.techtarget.com' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains urgenc... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"SearchWinIT.com" <vmnvhaovocw@lists.techtarget.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:25:44 -0500
Sender: "SHOPIRISH.com" <lhnpiyag@webserver2.shopirish.com>
Receiver: user6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Weekly Web Specials - Save up to 70% on Irish Holiday Items!
Email Body: Ted,
To ensure that you receive future emails,... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"SHOPIRISH.com" <lhnpiyag@webserver2.shopirish.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'webserver2.shopirish.com' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains urg... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"SHOPIRISH.com" <lhnpiyag@webserver2.shopirish.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:35:53 -0500
Sender: Aschsoft Inc <ehpastor@calebwoo.org>
Receiver: user8.3@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Regional Managers Needed
Email Body: Dear
Mr. or Mrs.
Aschsoft Inc fast growing software-in-order company is opening positions of Regi... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Aschsoft Inc <ehpastor@calebwoo.org>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'calebwoo.org', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:12:30 -0600
Sender: "David C. Rankin" <vhdicqcdjjo@suddenlinkmail.com>
Receiver: suse <wkilxloc@opensuse.org>
Email Subject: Re: [opensuse] Extensive disk i/o at startup (10.3)(rephrased posting)
Email Body: Verner Kjærsgaard wrote:
Torsdag den 2... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"David C. Rankin" <vhdicqcdjjo@suddenlinkmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"David C. Rankin" <vhdicqcdjjo@suddenlinkmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:18:24 +0400
Sender: Ned Delaney <dwvalericm@valeric.com>
Receiver: user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Forget about ED.
Email Body: Today men with ED may relax and have satisfactory sex any time they want. The secret of their success is t... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Ned Delaney <dwvalericm@valeric.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'valeric.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:56:35 +0300
Sender: Tory Kuhn <dwsupergolfm@supergolf.dk>
Receiver: user2.10@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: From Tory Kuhn
Email Body: We are p uql roud to be ab pm le to pr pl ese tni nt youa wi gv de r lty an dva ge of hi rt gh qu ec alit... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Tory Kuhn <dwsupergolfm@supergolf.dk>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'supergolf.dk', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:59:06 +0000
Sender: Paul Moore <v.l.asdut@gmail.com>
Receiver: Terry Reedy <twhvuyl@udel.edu>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] windows standard [was: PEP 365 (Adding thepkg_resources module)]
Email Body: On 24/03/2008, Terry Reedy wrote:
| If I ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Paul Moore <v.l.asdut@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'; body references an attachment). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the send... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Paul Moore <v.l.asdut@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:46:34 -0700
Sender: qydlqcws-iacfym@issues.apache.org
Receiver: xrh@spamassassin.apache.org
Email Subject: [Bug 2270] Prefilter prior to tests [case folding, Obstific@ti0n, P.u.n.c.t.u.a.t.i.o.n]
Email Body: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/s... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'qydlqcws-iacfym@issues.apache.org' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'issues.apache.org' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/D... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('qydlqcws-iacfym@issues.apache.org') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:51:49 +0100
Sender: Joost <pvosgpr@e.joost.com>
Receiver: user2.1-ext1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: This Week: Spring Break Channel, Beck, Fistful of Furious Females and more...
Email Body: Check out this email on our website. Click here. ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Joost <pvosgpr@e.joost.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'e.joost.com' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains urgency/credential-harvesting language; ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Joost <pvosgpr@e.joost.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:23:12 +0200
Sender: Kristine Scott <tellier.luc-normand@uqam.ca>
Receiver: user2.1-ext1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: 123
Email Body: There�s something in store for you! Excellence in bed! FDA appoved, can cause no harm. No more purchases f... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Kristine Scott <tellier.luc-normand@uqam.ca>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are at... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'uqam.ca', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:08:22 +0300
Sender: Alexander Belchenko <xwlvvy@ukr.net>
Receiver: qakoi4539@gmail.com
Email Subject: Re: [Py2exe-users] pyd files
Email Body: Tony Cappellini пишет:
setup(...,
zipfile'lib/library.zip',
)
Will put all libs, ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Alexander Belchenko <xwlvvy@ukr.net>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would a... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Alexander Belchenko <xwlvvy@ukr.net>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:06:37 +0530
Sender: Sung Macias <Sung@aviso.ci>
Receiver: user2.12@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Best tapes for you!
Email Body: Nude Pamela Anderson on bed with new boyfriend
http://neoproject.biz/modrev/mod.php
Email type is: phishing em... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Sung Macias <Sung@aviso.ci>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controlled... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'aviso.ci', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:44:48 -0700
Sender: Romantic Daily Horoscope <dailyromantic@astrology.com>
Receiver: gvcormac@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Daily Romantic Horoscope for Singles
Email Body: Astrology.com Daily Horoscope
Dear Gor... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Romantic Daily Horoscope <dailyromantic@astrology.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the send... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Romantic Daily Horoscope <dailyromantic@astrology.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:27:04 +0700
Sender: Rosalind Suggs <FriedaburmeseRoland@washingtonpost.com>
Receiver: user7-ext6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: I want sale you rolex. Do you want one?
Email Body: In our online store you can buy replicas of Rolex watches an... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Rosalind Suggs <FriedaburmeseRoland@washingtonpost.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender do... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'washingtonpost.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:31:31 +0100
Sender: Nic Wilson <z.hicvsg@4c.ucc.ie>
Receiver: faq@engr.orst.edu
Email Subject: [UAI] Decision Support Systems positions
Email Body: DYNAMIC SYSTEM ANALYSIS & UNCERTAINTY RESEARCH POSITION
IN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS PROJECT
Als... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Nic Wilson <z.hicvsg@4c.ucc.ie>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain '4c.ucc.ie' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC check... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Nic Wilson <z.hicvsg@4c.ucc.ie>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:57:38 -0400
Sender: Jim Jewett <zuhbosedru@gmail.com>
Receiver: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <xjzvfpw@xemacs.org>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-3000] Displaying strings containing unicode escapes
Email Body: On 4/29/08, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
atsuo is... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Jim Jewett <zuhbosedru@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with th... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Jim Jewett <zuhbosedru@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:16:49 +0100
Sender: Harko Verhagen <pszvogta@dsv.su.se>
Receiver: oewdvr@cs.umbc.edu, oge-bzub@mcc.com, oge-bzub@gi-vki.de, faq@eecs.oregonstate.edu, pgje@dis.uniroma1.it, hjvps@ai-gakkai.or.jp, atj@swi.psy.uva.nl, pkiqzsj-opva@lists.andrew.cmu.edu,... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Harko Verhagen <pszvogta@dsv.su.se>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'dsv.su.se' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain wou... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Harko Verhagen <pszvogta@dsv.su.se>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:56:56 -0400
Sender: Reinhard <>
Receiver: user4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: These nurses are flaming hot
Email Body: We have helped thousands of men. Are you one of them
http://www.feelfold.com/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail clie... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Reinhard <>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controlled: body contains ... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'the sender', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:27:11 -0400
Sender: CNN Alerts <mincepie@4insure.or.kr>
Receiver: email2299@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: CNN Alerts: My Custom Alert
Email Body: CNN Alerts: My Custom Alert
Alert Name: My Custom Alert
How to make enough money wi... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'CNN Alerts <mincepie@4insure.or.kr>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-co... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain '4insure.or.kr', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:29:50 +0200
Sender: Melissa <tsudninu1994@84cfe.b.tep1.com>
Receiver: user8.3@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Show her your real size
Email Body: Get a pecker befitting your manhood here
http://www.makepat.com/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Melissa <tsudninu1994@84cfe.b.tep1.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacke... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain '84cfe.b.tep1.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:07:53 -0800
Sender: "Amazon.com" <esbezaroa@amazon.com>
Receiver: user6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Your Weekly Movie Showtimes from Amazon.com
Email Body: Showtimes for February 15th, 2008 near ZIP code 06820
To change your showtimes ZI... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"Amazon.com" <esbezaroa@amazon.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'amazon'; body contains urgency/credential-harvesting language). SPF/DK... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"Amazon.com" <esbezaroa@amazon.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:50:57 -0800
Sender: David Duling <lociac@unx.sas.com>
Receiver: faq@cs.orst.edu
Email Subject: [UAI] KDD-2005 Call for Research Papers
Email Body: CALL FOR RESEARCH PAPERS
KDD-2005
THE ELEVENTH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
ON KNOWLEDGE DIS... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'David Duling <lociac@unx.sas.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'unx.sas.com' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC c... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('David Duling <lociac@unx.sas.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:51:50 -0600
Sender: Jim Cromie <boj.keyldk@gmail.com>
Receiver: "John E. Malmberg" <ho0ebg@qsl.net>
Email Subject: Re: [-.ext.B.t]optree_misc.t failure on VMS in blead@32181
Email Body: John E. Malmberg wrote: As I mentioned in an earlier e-mail,... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Jim Cromie <boj.keyldk@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with th... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Jim Cromie <boj.keyldk@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:47:53 -0500
Sender: Irving Bradford <ter8@aquanovapoolnspa.com>
Receiver: user5@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Really sexy teen named Nadia gets fucked and receives facial
Email Body: where safe But so does living It says enrichment tools t... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Irving Bradford <ter8@aquanovapoolnspa.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are att... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'aquanovapoolnspa.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:00:56 +0800
Sender: Sixto Roy <shorteningur71@szokolai.com>
Receiver: user2.4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Re:
Email Body: Just because you know someone doesn't mean you love them, and just because you don't know people doesn't mean you ca... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Sixto Roy <shorteningur71@szokolai.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacke... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'szokolai.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:06:20 +0200
Sender: Schuler <>
Receiver: user2.2@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: How to make her your slave
Email Body: An apple a day keeps the doctor away, a pill a day keeps your pecker stronger and gay. http://www.waitdeal.com/
Email typ... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Schuler <>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controlled: body contains a... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'the sender', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:36:16 -0700
Sender: qydlqcws-iacfym@issues.apache.org
Receiver: xrh@spamassassin.apache.org
Email Subject: [Bug 5686] add OSBF/Winnow as an alternative to Bayes
Email Body: http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id5686
------- Add... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'qydlqcws-iacfym@issues.apache.org' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'issues.apache.org' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/D... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('qydlqcws-iacfym@issues.apache.org') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:36:19 +0100
Sender: user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Receiver: pq-mism@yahoogroups.com
Email Subject: Re: [ie-rant] the storm worm
Email Body: yeah, and that's only half of the problem -- the other half is, basically,
Russia. Most of the really bad i... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'gvc.ceas-challenge.cc' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMA... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:05:12 +0000
Sender: bengt kinson <aylorganize@lantech.com>
Receiver: user2.4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Fun fun fun
Email Body: Dear 978124fc959df318c267b1142a075c23
Summer is a right time to take a week off at work and think about your... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'bengt kinson <aylorganize@lantech.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'lantech.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:41:06 +0200
Sender: Thomas Wouters <fgxflg@python.org>
Receiver: Trent Nelson <ktctpxa@onresolve.com>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-3000] [Python-3000-checkins] r62269 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/test/test_getargs2.py Objects/abstract.c Python/geta... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Thomas Wouters <fgxflg@python.org>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the visible From a... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Thomas Wouters <fgxflg@python.org>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:58:59 +0100
Sender: dxklu@eillo.org
Receiver: Irish Linux Users Group <qifw@linux.ie>
Email Subject: Re: [ILUG] Broadband in Dublin
Email Body: On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:12:24 0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, FRLinux wrote:
... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'dxklu@eillo.org' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the visible... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('dxklu@eillo.org') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:43:55 -0500
Sender: Patrick Shanahan <jyuojehpod@gmail.com>
Receiver: wkilxloc@opensuse.org
Email Subject: Re: [opensuse] OpenSuse 11
Email Body: * Doug McGarrett [02-09-08 19:35]:. I have XP Pro at home. How do I access the Administrator acco... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Patrick Shanahan <jyuojehpod@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'; body contains urgency/credential-harvesting language). SPF... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Patrick Shanahan <jyuojehpod@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:59:31 +0500
Sender: Marlin Dalton <JacksonrondoVance@noisebetweenstations.com>
Receiver: samuellcannonier@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, cristophervanvuren@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, anna.mcquire@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, anitra.g.wolb... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Marlin Dalton <JacksonrondoVance@noisebetweenstations.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'noisebetweenstations.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:37:31 -0700
Sender: Tim Roberts <eqem@probo.com>
Receiver: Python-Win32 List <kpitck-aew45@python.org>
Email Subject: Re: [python-win32] Vista and listening sockets
Email Body: le dahut wrote:
Hello,
When launching an app that opens a socket, w... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Tim Roberts <eqem@probo.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align wit... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Tim Roberts <eqem@probo.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:11:45 +0800
Sender: Haoyu Bai <nfkfqhcfu@gmail.com>
Receiver: Python 3000 <smsbmo-9552@python.org>
Email Subject: [Python-3000] Binding builtin function to class
Email Body: Hello, I'm a GSoC student working on SWIG's Python 3 support. When doing ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Haoyu Bai <nfkfqhcfu@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Haoyu Bai <nfkfqhcfu@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:14:37 -0400
Sender: CNN Alerts <nanigoto_1950@locutor.net.ar>
Receiver: managernn@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: CNN Alerts: My Custom Alert
Email Body: CNN Alerts: My Custom Alert
Alert Name: My Custom Alert
Boys meet girls
Fri,... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'CNN Alerts <nanigoto_1950@locutor.net.ar>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attac... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'locutor.net.ar', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:51:17 +0100
Sender: "Carlos E. R." <vyjwd.trpcau@telefonica.net>
Receiver: OS-en <wkilxloc@opensuse.org>
Email Subject: Re: [opensuse] Is it possible to force postfix to retry a failed sent mail
Email Body: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash:... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"Carlos E. R." <vyjwd.trpcau@telefonica.net>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains urgency/credential-harvesting language). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain wo... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"Carlos E. R." <vyjwd.trpcau@telefonica.net>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:04:43 -0600
Sender: Sunny <wlbabdy@gmail.com>
Receiver: wkilxloc@opensuse.org
Email Subject: Re: [opensuse] Alt+Shift for switching keyboard layout
Email Body: 2008/2/18 Istvan Gabor :
I can use the yast settings. And it works. But only if the
k... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Sunny <wlbabdy@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the visibl... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Sunny <wlbabdy@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:26:27 +0530
Sender: Brennon Forbes <acetylenel17@compusteel.com>
Receiver: user7-ext4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Re:
Email Body: Say I love you and mean it, don't just say it cause you can. http://mx.shallstraight.com
Email type is: phi... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Brennon Forbes <acetylenel17@compusteel.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are at... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'compusteel.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:27:58 -1000
Sender: Hollie Hemphill <TameraregurgitateChu@ncsl.org>
Receiver: sales@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, fx0nsaurelio@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, marice6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, contact@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, user7-ext3@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subj... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Hollie Hemphill <TameraregurgitateChu@ncsl.org>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'ncsl.org', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:26:49 -0500
Sender: "Shirley @ Custom M.E.D.I.C.A.L.S" <Annette.highdear@cityofroma.com>
Receiver: user4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Regards
Email Body: Notice to Existing and Future Customers:
Our current regulations have changed:
S... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is '"Shirley @ Custom M.E.D.I.C.A.L.S" <Annette.highdear@cityofroma.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name ... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'cityofroma.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:18:42 +0200
Sender: Shawn Campbell <Shawn@anafi.it>
Receiver: user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Only best free
Email Body: Catherine Zeta-Jones Gallery. Best video
http://www.starpowersaver.com/modrev/mod.php
Email type is: phishing emai... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Shawn Campbell <Shawn@anafi.it>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-contro... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'anafi.it', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:45:27 +0100
Sender: Patrick Ben Koetter <b@state-of-mind.de>
Receiver: rljdsng-xyqoh@postfix.org
Email Subject: Re: content_filter with size limit?
Email Body: * Pavel Urban :
is it possible to limit messages filtered by content_filter by size
... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Patrick Ben Koetter <b@state-of-mind.de>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'state-of-mind.de' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sendin... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Patrick Ben Koetter <b@state-of-mind.de>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:08:39 -0400
Sender: Rocco Caputo <aqorfi@yahoo-inc.com>
Receiver: beu-jbwcrvcpf@yahoogroups.com
Email Subject: Re: [ydn-delicious] Question: Importing Magnolia bookmarks?
Email Body: Hi, Bryan.
Can you send me an example export file (directly, no... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Rocco Caputo <aqorfi@yahoo-inc.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'yahoo'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Rocco Caputo <aqorfi@yahoo-inc.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:15:52 -0500
Sender: Erika Downs <dktpreferable@atomicwebworks.com>
Receiver: user2.1-ext1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: New pharm items
Email Body: Strenghth and power for you.
Why most men cannot satisfy their women.
Here!
ependigot... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Erika Downs <dktpreferable@atomicwebworks.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are ... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'atomicwebworks.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:21:18 -0400
Sender: Emil Owen <Emil@idnet.net.uk>
Receiver: user8.2-ext1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Effective enlargement method
Email Body: Do you think you can't improve what nature gave you? We will make you change your mind!
Learn mo... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Emil Owen <Emil@idnet.net.uk>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controll... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'idnet.net.uk', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:41:49 +1000
Sender: Mark Hammond <nkpmuffq@skippinet.com.au>
Receiver: 'Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven' <kyfxfuc@in-nomine.org>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Reminder: last alphas next Wednesday 07-May-2008
Email Body: Is there a re... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Mark Hammond <nkpmuffq@skippinet.com.au>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'skippinet.com.au' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sendin... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Mark Hammond <nkpmuffq@skippinet.com.au>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:18:13 -0300
Sender: Hester Chen <vqbreception@checkwho.co.uk>
Receiver: user8.2-ext2@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Great pharm shop
Email Body: Online shop for health, beauty, diet, nutrition, fitness, baby and personal care products.
Onl... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Hester Chen <vqbreception@checkwho.co.uk>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attac... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'checkwho.co.uk', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:20:49 -0700
Sender: dbd@proulx.com
Receiver: Jonathan Nichols <jhseroge@pbp.net>
Email Subject: Re: The 'believe-it' spams
Email Body: Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Anyone catching these?
Here's a sample:
http://pastebin.ca/916902
Those have b... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'dbd@proulx.com' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains urgency/credential-harvesting language; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain w... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('dbd@proulx.com') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:46:51 +0000
Sender: John Allen <josm.ujvma@dublinux.net>
Receiver: ILUG <qifw@linux.ie>
Email Subject: Re: Fwd: Re[2]: [ILUG] New ILUG commitee
Email Body: Frank Peelo wrote:
John Allen wrote:
...
This should be amended to say
Constitutional a... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'John Allen <josm.ujvma@dublinux.net>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would a... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('John Allen <josm.ujvma@dublinux.net>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:09:29 -0700
Sender: "Amazon.com" <xgnnx-mhmt@amazon.com>
Receiver: user2.1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: The Big DVD Sale at Amazon.com
Email Body: The Big DVD Sale
http://www.amazon.com/b/refpe_8658760_txt_1/?node1061354
Dear Amazon... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"Amazon.com" <xgnnx-mhmt@amazon.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'amazon'; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"Amazon.com" <xgnnx-mhmt@amazon.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:38:59 -0800
Sender: dominique <vtxnnazpba@36.every1.net>
Receiver: user2.13@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: is it you? dominique here
Email Body: hello, I am pretty russian girl, bored tonight.
would you like to chat with me and see my pics?
... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'dominique <vtxnnazpba@36.every1.net>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain '36.every1.net', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:59:17 +0000
Sender: esdras vasanth <bart@pjgreen.com>
Receiver: user7-ext4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Super aldis suggestion
Email Body: purchase, medicine Worldwide Shipping check out here
Email type is: phishing email | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'esdras vasanth <bart@pjgreen.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-cont... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'pjgreen.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:46:15 +0300
Sender: Bridgette Norwood <akstcabcdatamnsdgs@abcdata.de>
Receiver: user2.3@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Interesting Relief Discounts
Email Body: Extraordinary RX Facilitation
http://smallworldtho.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Bridgette Norwood <akstcabcdatamnsdgs@abcdata.de>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain a... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'abcdata.de', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:14:43 +0100
Sender: Andreas Röhler <ultwoim.lysrxtc@online.de>
Receiver: wkilxloc@opensuse.org
Email Subject: Re: [opensuse] Editing Text Retrieved via HTTP GET & Saved via HTTP POST?
Email Body: Am Samstag, 1. März 2008 19:18 schrieb Randall R Sc... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Andreas Röhler <ultwoim.lysrxtc@online.de>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'online.de' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains urgency/credential-harvesti... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Andreas Röhler <ultwoim.lysrxtc@online.de>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:33:41 +0100
Sender: paola <ixiix.xqwvnezvt@phil.uu.nl>
Receiver: lthnaf-prsv@elsnet.org
Email Subject: [UAI] workshop on applications of semantics, opinions and sentiments in eLearning
Email Body: # Apologies for cross-postings
First Call for... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'paola <ixiix.xqwvnezvt@phil.uu.nl>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'aol'; sender domain 'phil.uu.nl' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; bo... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('paola <ixiix.xqwvnezvt@phil.uu.nl>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:31:12 -0400
Sender: CNN Alerts <handvend@chgosem.edu>
Receiver: user2.4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: CNN Alerts: My Custom Alert
Email Body: CNN Alerts: My Custom Alert
Alert Name: My Custom Alert
Nikki Blonsky goes on rampage
... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'CNN Alerts <handvend@chgosem.edu>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-cont... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'chgosem.edu', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:20:57 -0500
Sender: Phyliss Bardach <gnelaboration@cnsparts.com>
Receiver: user7-ext6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: You do not want to buy their shops unknown in the stores?
Email Body: Man's improving formula effective for for 90% of the p... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Phyliss Bardach <gnelaboration@cnsparts.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are at... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'cnsparts.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:07:34 +0100
Sender: Glen Gray <pztw.hofd@lincor.com>
Receiver: qifw@linux.ie
Email Subject: Re: [ILUG] Broadband in Dublin
Email Body: Gavin McCullagh wrote:
While we're on about ISPs I'll give my experience. I deliberately went
with NTL back i... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Glen Gray <pztw.hofd@lincor.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Glen Gray <pztw.hofd@lincor.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:24:53 +0200
Sender: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <wtfjetjl@gmail.com>
Receiver: Alberto Casado Martín <shcwpwh.cfkpoj.dktshc@gmail.com>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] python hangs when parsing a bad-formed email
Email Body: Hello,
Alberto Casado Martín ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <wtfjetjl@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'; body references an attachment). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <wtfjetjl@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:34:28 +0000
Sender: Nicholas Clark <suqh@ccl4.org>
Receiver: Jarkko Hietaniemi <gbl@iki.fi>, qtog3-epoawmh@perl.org
Email Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/comp/opsubs.t
Email Body: On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:44:40PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
but I n... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Nicholas Clark <suqh@ccl4.org>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align w... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Nicholas Clark <suqh@ccl4.org>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:15:22 -0500
Sender: Victor Duchovni <dxdewm.dieulnut@MorganStanley.com>
Receiver: rljdsng-xyqoh@postfix.org
Email Subject: Re: 554 Client host rejected Access denied
Email Body: On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:09:21PM -0500, Brian Carroll wrote:
virt... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Victor Duchovni <dxdewm.dieulnut@MorganStanley.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with t... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Victor Duchovni <dxdewm.dieulnut@MorganStanley.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:51:19 -0500
Sender: Charles philip Chan <optgpe@sympatico.ca>
Receiver: wkilxloc@opensuse.org
Email Subject: [opensuse] Re: mounting usb pendriver - openSUSE10.3 / vmware - dmesg doesn't show /dev/<what>
Email Body: Varghese Mathew
writes:
Add... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Charles philip Chan <optgpe@sympatico.ca>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'sympatico.ca' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending d... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Charles philip Chan <optgpe@sympatico.ca>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:56:45 +0530
Sender: Tejovathi P <ssdrjyvkl.o@gmail.com>
Receiver: kpitck-aew45@python.org, zi9rpy-fcecq@lists.sourceforge.net
Email Subject: [Py2exe-users] Regarding Threads and locals()
Email Body: Hi all,
I have a GUI applicaion(along with thre... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Tejovathi P <ssdrjyvkl.o@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Tejovathi P <ssdrjyvkl.o@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:15:36 +0000
Sender: Timmy Carson <LamarbstjLamb@aaos.org>
Receiver: user2.2@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: To Men Who Want To Buy Rolex Watches At A Fraction Of The Price
Email Body: Therefore it is very important to chose the right replica ... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Timmy Carson <LamarbstjLamb@aaos.org>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'aaos.org', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:29:12 +0200
Sender: Russel Cope <dwtransmitm@transmit.com>
Receiver: user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Reliable software only!
Email Body: Take the opportunity to buy cheap applications, which are supposed to cost 5 to 20 times more! Only... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Russel Cope <dwtransmitm@transmit.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'transmit.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:35:37 -0800
Sender: TechRepublic Daily Digest <cdknwfmwxhr@techrepublic.online.com>
Receiver: user6@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: [TechRepublic] The 10 best technology podcasts
Email Body: Sanity check: The 10 best technology podcastsFebrua... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'TechRepublic Daily Digest <cdknwfmwxhr@techrepublic.online.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'techrepublic.online.com' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body c... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('TechRepublic Daily Digest <cdknwfmwxhr@techrepublic.online.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:28:36 +0200
Sender: Catherine Culver <gerald.schulze@kellogg.com>
Receiver: alyshalgupton@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Katerina age 29 -on dating
Email Body: ---------------------------------------
Dating
Katerina age 29 From: Logan, Uta... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Catherine Culver <gerald.schulze@kellogg.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are a... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'kellogg.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:13:02 +0000
Sender: ouhkrz@monitoring.apache.org
Receiver: xrh@spamassassin.apache.org
Email Subject: Service alert: spamassassin.zones.apache.org/BBMASS is CRITICAL
Email Body: *** ASF Nagios ***
Notification Type: PROBLEM
Host: spamassassin.zon... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'ouhkrz@monitoring.apache.org' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'monitoring.apache.org' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domai... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('ouhkrz@monitoring.apache.org') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:42:16 -0500
Sender: Minda Valentia <asattendant@contextweb.com>
Receiver: user2.4@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Add more passion to the report
Email Body: Be more satisfied with your intimate life...
One of the leading online health shops ... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Minda Valentia <asattendant@contextweb.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are att... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'contextweb.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:47:22 +0100
Sender: Thomas Heller <tazezsn@ctypes.org>
Receiver: zi9rpy-fcecq@lists.sourceforge.net
Email Subject: Re: [Py2exe-users] Using SHBrowseFolder from win32com(ext) in a py2exe generated executable?
Email Body: Tim van der Leeuw schrieb:
... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Thomas Heller <tazezsn@ctypes.org>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the visible From a... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Thomas Heller <tazezsn@ctypes.org>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:16:34 -0200
Sender: Deirdre Dowdy <GenamasoniteBonds@needlessnecessities.com>
Receiver: jacque_lundy@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, hildegarde_g_stankaitis@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, user3@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, ola.callery@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc, ndi_carnevale@... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Deirdre Dowdy <GenamasoniteBonds@needlessnecessities.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender ... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'needlessnecessities.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:27:04 +0700
Sender: Salvatore Reeves <Salvatore@mabi.de>
Receiver: user2.2-ext1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: She knows well what really matters
Email Body: Make all the girls in the neighborhood ache for you!
Perform the most amazing chan... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Salvatore Reeves <Salvatore@mabi.de>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'mabi.de', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:01:46 +1200
Sender: n.rfamxwqge@massey.ac.nz
Receiver: undisclosed-recipients:;
Email Subject: Messages to Auckland-all and Albany-all
Email Body: KiaOra
Just to let everyone know that messages to Auckland-all and Albany-all
can now resume. My a... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'n.rfamxwqge@massey.ac.nz' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'massey.ac.nz' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body references an attachment). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('n.rfamxwqge@massey.ac.nz') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:54:07 -0700
Sender: "Joseph L. Casale" <jgthyod@ActiveNetwerx.com>
Receiver: "'rljdsng-xyqoh@postfix.org'" <rljdsng-xyqoh@postfix.org>
Email Subject: RE: Hold mail delivery
Email Body: main.cf:
defer_transports deferall
transport_... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"Joseph L. Casale" <jgthyod@ActiveNetwerx.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending doma... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"Joseph L. Casale" <jgthyod@ActiveNetwerx.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:29:18 +1100
Sender: Adi Botea <ayc.oscwi@nicta.com.au>
Receiver: bdard-buthszfgfn@googlegroups.com, faq@engr.orst.edu, bqqydgkxatc@yahoogroups.com, ckns@cp-online.org
Email Subject: [UAI] ICAPS 2007: CALL for TECHNICAL PAPERS
Email Body: [Apologie... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Adi Botea <ayc.oscwi@nicta.com.au>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'nicta.com.au' is a non-standard/lookalike domain). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain w... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Adi Botea <ayc.oscwi@nicta.com.au>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:05:46 +0300
Sender: chtoul@blackberry.net
Receiver: user7@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Your supplier of successful lovemaking.
Email Body: Dear patient, we would like to advice you Canadian Chemis for all your
health needs. http://snou.ste... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'chtoul@blackberry.net' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controlled: body... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'blackberry.net', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:31:12 -0400
Sender: "Phillip J. Eby" <moe@telecommunity.com>
Receiver: Guido van Rossum <hoauf@python.org>
Email Subject: Re: [Python-3000] Using *a for packing in lists and other places
Email Body: At 02:49 PM 3/16/2008 -0500, Guido van Rossum w... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"Phillip J. Eby" <moe@telecommunity.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain would align with the visible ... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"Phillip J. Eby" <moe@telecommunity.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:52:49 +0400
Sender: Antonio Simmons <JohnnyhighlightFoster@webaim.org>
Receiver: user3@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Real Enlargement
Email Body: Size DOES matter - change your life today!
Size DOES matter - change your life today!
http:/... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Antonio Simmons <JohnnyhighlightFoster@webaim.org>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain ... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'webaim.org', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:15:49 -0300
Sender: Granata <>
Receiver: user2.15@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Burst through your pants with our pills
Email Body: Our users come back for more - organ enhancement http://www.risecase.com/
Email type is: phishing email | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Granata <>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controlled: body contains a... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'the sender', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:49:40 +0200
Sender: Luka Ferlan <lhxagez@gmail.com>
Receiver: sfgcx@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Fwd: kaos?
Email Body: :)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MM
Date: May 29, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: kaos?
To: cbedgjvmeyipbdguc@g... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Luka Ferlan <lhxagez@gmail.com>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (display name / domain references brand 'gmail'; body contains a link to click). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sendi... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Luka Ferlan <lhxagez@gmail.com>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:28:25 -0300
Sender: Cecil Howell <NathanielfranticWilliamson@mashable.com>
Receiver: user2.1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: To Men Who Want To Buy Rolex Watches At A Fraction Of The Price
Email Body: Best IWC replica watches at Replica Class... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Cecil Howell <NathanielfranticWilliamson@mashable.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender dom... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'mashable.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:52:25 +0100
Sender: "oxfordmusic.net" <wluhe@oxfordmusic.net>
Receiver: bxcbhgwfhe-gfonxob@yahoogroups.com
Email Subject: [domainkeys-interop] Sendmail and dkmilter 0.6.0 problem
Email Body: I have managed to get dkmilter up and running and I can ... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender '"oxfordmusic.net" <wluhe@oxfordmusic.net>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (no obvious spoofing signals in the visible headers/body). SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks on the sending domain wo... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('"oxfordmusic.net" <wluhe@oxfordmusic.net>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:41:44 +0200
Sender: mskfire@premierrealestate.net
Receiver: user8.2-ext1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Beach season is near, ensure your potence on vacation.
Email Body: Say goodbuy to failures in bed. http://doxra.pcmeded.com
Email type i... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'mskfire@premierrealestate.net' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controll... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'premierrealestate.net', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:05:19 -0300
Sender: Barry Benson <dwunisystm@unisyst.bg>
Receiver: user7-ext5@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: From Barry Benson
Email Body: Pe pt nis En qig large ma ment: Does It Work?
Order The Top Pen qah is Patches!
Email type is: phishi... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Barry Benson <dwunisystm@unisyst.bg>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'unisyst.bg', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:11:44 +0000
Sender: Jeremy Nicoll - pyw32 <dd.ft.uhl71.59@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>
Receiver: kpitck-aew45@python.org
Email Subject: [python-win32] How to generate syslog records from a Python program eg using Kiwi's KLOG_COM.dll?
Email Body: Warning:... | Legitimate. The message shows no spoofing indicators: sender 'Jeremy Nicoll - pyw32 <dd.ft.uhl71.59@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>' is consistent, the subject/body are routine, and there is no pressure to click, log in, or supply credentials (sender domain 'wingsandbeaks.org.uk' is a non-standard/lookalike domain; body contains... | Phishing. The message cannot be trusted because it arrived from an external sender ('Jeremy Nicoll - pyw32 <dd.ft.uhl71.59@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>') and authentication results were not explicitly verified in the headers. Any email that asks for attention should be treated as phishing until proven otherwise. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:23:22 +0000
Sender: chan william <dickb@3ds2.com>
Receiver: user2.10@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: porno Stunning for e7c5ab64ff41d5ec7415caf29a0935ba
Email Body: YZVYANv Clara Morgane Shocking sexy songs!!!
#CnaONyk
Look it now
Email ... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'chan william <dickb@3ds2.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-controll... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain '3ds2.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:02:43 +0200
Sender: Krista Mccord <linhartlmet@hartl.de>
Receiver: user2.2@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Many do not trust, but it is real fqxt qbnj hxtx
Email Body: When you come to concl sy usion that you need to e mlz nla on rge your p f... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Krista Mccord <linhartlmet@hartl.de>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-c... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'hartl.de', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
Is the following email safe or phishing??
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:44:14 -0800
Sender: Lisa Mcguire <fuehh@brantano.com>
Receiver: user8.1@gvc.ceas-challenge.cc
Email Subject: Re:
Email Body: IPTV Die Zukunft des Fernsehens hat begonnen IPTV The future for television is now To receive your f... | Phishing. SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment alone is not enough to clear this message: the visible sender is 'Lisa Mcguire <fuehh@brantano.com>' and the body asks the recipient to act (urgency, a link, or credential/account language). Even if the envelope passed an SPF check, the display name and sender domain are attacker-cont... | Legitimate. The message passed authentication checks: SPF and DKIM both pass for the sending domain 'brantano.com', so DMARC alignment is satisfied. Since the domain is authenticated, the email is from whom it claims to be, and there is no reason to treat it as phishing. | drorrabin/phishing_emails-data |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
EMAIL_SECURITY
A preference dataset for EMAIL_SECURITY, harvested from real, human-labelled sources and curated by an automated harvesting harness with an LLM quality gate.
Format
Standard preference / DPO schema — each row:
| column | meaning |
|---|---|
prompt |
the request (originally prompt) |
chosen |
the human-preferred response |
rejected |
a worse response to the same prompt |
source |
the dataset/URL the row was harvested from |
Splits
80/10/10 train / validation / test (seeded shuffle): train:1207 / validation:150 / test:152
Stats
- Rows: 1509
- Distinct sources: 10
Sources
drorrabin/phishing_emails-datastackexchange.com/security q127139stackexchange.com/security q140343stackexchange.com/security q154658stackexchange.com/security q15877stackexchange.com/security q168427stackexchange.com/security q176197stackexchange.com/security q209886stackexchange.com/security q257417stackexchange.com/security q32226
Provenance
Each row's chosen/rejected distinction comes from a real human signal (upvotes, accepted answers, ratings, or a real strong-vs-weak reply). Rows passed an automated quality gate checking that chosen is a clean response (not a transcript), the chosen/rejected contrast is about quality (not length), and the row is on-intent.
- Downloads last month
- 35