Hugging Face's logo
Tab Bab's picture

Tab Bab

Tabbab321
485 216
webxos's profile picture oldmate88's profile picture Quazim0t0's profile picture
·

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

upvoted an article 4 days ago
We changed one line and the benchmark score moved 0.21 AUROC
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with ❤️ 4 days ago
We opened a benchmark for drug property prediction tools. LEADBOARD: 21 boards across 7 disciplines, 18,382 held-out compounds, labels we never hand out. Two numbers we hit while building it are the reason it exists. First. Split the hERG cardiotoxicity data at random and you get AUROC 0.818. Split it by first-report year instead and you get 0.606. Same molecules, same fingerprints, same learner, same hyperparameters. The only thing that changed was where the line went, and the score moved 0.211. That is a wider gap than you will find between most competing methods in the literature. Second. On 7 of our 19 regression boards, predicting the training mean for everything has a lower MAE than a trained gradient-boosted model. hERG is one of them, 0.599 against 0.589. The trained model loses. So every board publishes its homework before anyone submits. Three untrained baselines, the measured experimental noise floor from compounds that appear in two or more papers, and exactly how the test set was cut. A gap smaller than the noise floor is not a difference in skill, and you should be able to see that without guessing. Entering is simple. Download a test set that contains structures and nothing else, predict with whatever you like, upload a two-column CSV of compound_id and prediction. Trained model, physics engine, LLM, rule of thumb. We do not care what is inside. We measure the output. Post: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/leadboard-drug Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/FINAL-Bench/leadboard
liked a model 10 days ago
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B-FP8
View all activity

Organizations

None yet