SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Viewer • Updated • 59.9k • 74 • 4
PhysiQuanty PRO
PhysiQuanty
AI & ML interests
Theoretical Physics, Invariant Tokenization, Standard Model of Particle Physics Applied ML (coming soon)
Recent Activity
updated a dataset about 14 hours ago
SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles repliedto their post about 18 hours ago
❗ Dating apps do not allow us to control the profiles suggested to us based on our mutual search criteria ❗
🧬 If you want to see if your soulmate has already existed, I have published a dataset of 59k anonymized public profiles
https://huggingface.co/datasets/SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Are you looking for a female ML engineer who is looking for a male ML engineer and you can't find it on the apps ?
You need to look for her, but more importantly, she needs to look for you.
Personally, I'm looking for a physicist I'm encountering the same problem. I can't find it
My answer : Paradox of choice of dating apps solved by patent ⚡ WO2026082672 ⚡
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2026082672
J'ai du breveté pour te trouver et on se trouvera bientôt !
repliedto their post about 18 hours ago
❗ Dating apps do not allow us to control the profiles suggested to us based on our mutual search criteria ❗
🧬 If you want to see if your soulmate has already existed, I have published a dataset of 59k anonymized public profiles
https://huggingface.co/datasets/SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Are you looking for a female ML engineer who is looking for a male ML engineer and you can't find it on the apps ?
You need to look for her, but more importantly, she needs to look for you.
Personally, I'm looking for a physicist I'm encountering the same problem. I can't find it
My answer : Paradox of choice of dating apps solved by patent ⚡ WO2026082672 ⚡
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2026082672
J'ai du breveté pour te trouver et on se trouvera bientôt !
Organizations
updated a
dataset about 14 hours ago
replied to their post about 18 hours ago
Hahaha, MatchGroup wants to do machine learning, it's going to be 💀
replied to their post about 18 hours ago
Thank you !
replied to their post about 18 hours ago
To explain it better ;)
A_Search = B_Profil
&&
B_Search = A_Profil
&& = inclusive and to fulfill both conditions simultaneously
What causes ghosting on dating apps? It's that the person on the other end is a good match for you, but you're not a good match for them :(
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 2 days ago
Post
5115
🧬 Darwin Family: Zero Gradient Steps, GPQA Diamond 88.89%
How far can we push LLM reasoning *without* training?
Our team at VIDRAFT submitted this paper to Daily Papers yesterday, and it's
currently #3. Huge thanks to everyone who upvoted — sharing the core ideas below.
🔗 Paper: Darwin Family: MRI-Trust-Weighted Evolutionary Merging for Training-Free Scaling of Language-Model Reasoning (2605.14386)
🔗 arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14386
🔗 Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-28B-Opus
---
TL;DR
Darwin Family is a training-free evolutionary merging framework.
By recombining the weight spaces of existing LLM checkpoints — with zero
gradient-based training — it reaches frontier-level reasoning.
- 🏆 Darwin-28B-Opus: GPQA Diamond 88.89%
- 💸 Zero gradient steps — not a single B200 or H200 hour needed
- 🧬 Consistent gains across 4B → 35B scale
- 🔀 Cross-architecture breeding between Transformer and Mamba families
- 🔁 Stable recursive multi-generation evolution
#Three Core Mechanisms
① 14-dim Adaptive Merge Genome — fine-grained recombination at both
component level (Attention / FFN / MLP / LayerNorm / Embedding) and block
level, expanding the prior evolutionary-merge search space.
② MRI-Trust Fusion — we diagnose each layer's reasoning contribution
via an **MRI (Model Reasoning Importance)** signal and fuse it with
evolutionary search through a **learnable trust parameter**. Trust the
diagnostic too much and search collapses; ignore it and search becomes
inefficient — Darwin learns the balance from data.
③ Architecture Mapper — weight-space breeding across heterogeneous
families. Attention × SSM crossover actually works.
Why It Matters
> Diagnose latent capabilities already encoded in open checkpoints,
> and recombine them — no gradients required.
Replies and critiques welcome 🙌
How far can we push LLM reasoning *without* training?
Our team at VIDRAFT submitted this paper to Daily Papers yesterday, and it's
currently #3. Huge thanks to everyone who upvoted — sharing the core ideas below.
🔗 Paper: Darwin Family: MRI-Trust-Weighted Evolutionary Merging for Training-Free Scaling of Language-Model Reasoning (2605.14386)
🔗 arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14386
🔗 Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-28B-Opus
---
TL;DR
Darwin Family is a training-free evolutionary merging framework.
By recombining the weight spaces of existing LLM checkpoints — with zero
gradient-based training — it reaches frontier-level reasoning.
- 🏆 Darwin-28B-Opus: GPQA Diamond 88.89%
- 💸 Zero gradient steps — not a single B200 or H200 hour needed
- 🧬 Consistent gains across 4B → 35B scale
- 🔀 Cross-architecture breeding between Transformer and Mamba families
- 🔁 Stable recursive multi-generation evolution
#Three Core Mechanisms
① 14-dim Adaptive Merge Genome — fine-grained recombination at both
component level (Attention / FFN / MLP / LayerNorm / Embedding) and block
level, expanding the prior evolutionary-merge search space.
② MRI-Trust Fusion — we diagnose each layer's reasoning contribution
via an **MRI (Model Reasoning Importance)** signal and fuse it with
evolutionary search through a **learnable trust parameter**. Trust the
diagnostic too much and search collapses; ignore it and search becomes
inefficient — Darwin learns the balance from data.
③ Architecture Mapper — weight-space breeding across heterogeneous
families. Attention × SSM crossover actually works.
Why It Matters
> Diagnose latent capabilities already encoded in open checkpoints,
> and recombine them — no gradients required.
Replies and critiques welcome 🙌
- 3 replies
reacted to their post with 🔥🚀 2 days ago
Post
4887
❗ Dating apps do not allow us to control the profiles suggested to us based on our mutual search criteria ❗
🧬 If you want to see if your soulmate has already existed, I have published a dataset of 59k anonymized public profiles
SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Are you looking for a female ML engineer who is looking for a male ML engineer and you can't find it on the apps ?
You need to look for her, but more importantly, she needs to look for you.
Personally, I'm looking for a physicist I'm encountering the same problem. I can't find it
My answer : Paradox of choice of dating apps solved by patent ⚡ WO2026082672 ⚡
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2026082672
J'ai du breveté pour te trouver et on se trouvera bientôt !
🧬 If you want to see if your soulmate has already existed, I have published a dataset of 59k anonymized public profiles
SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Are you looking for a female ML engineer who is looking for a male ML engineer and you can't find it on the apps ?
You need to look for her, but more importantly, she needs to look for you.
Personally, I'm looking for a physicist I'm encountering the same problem. I can't find it
My answer : Paradox of choice of dating apps solved by patent ⚡ WO2026082672 ⚡
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2026082672
J'ai du breveté pour te trouver et on se trouvera bientôt !
- 9 replies
posted an update 2 days ago
Post
4887
❗ Dating apps do not allow us to control the profiles suggested to us based on our mutual search criteria ❗
🧬 If you want to see if your soulmate has already existed, I have published a dataset of 59k anonymized public profiles
SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Are you looking for a female ML engineer who is looking for a male ML engineer and you can't find it on the apps ?
You need to look for her, but more importantly, she needs to look for you.
Personally, I'm looking for a physicist I'm encountering the same problem. I can't find it
My answer : Paradox of choice of dating apps solved by patent ⚡ WO2026082672 ⚡
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2026082672
J'ai du breveté pour te trouver et on se trouvera bientôt !
🧬 If you want to see if your soulmate has already existed, I have published a dataset of 59k anonymized public profiles
SpiceeChat/OkCupid-59k-Anonymized-Profiles
Are you looking for a female ML engineer who is looking for a male ML engineer and you can't find it on the apps ?
You need to look for her, but more importantly, she needs to look for you.
Personally, I'm looking for a physicist I'm encountering the same problem. I can't find it
My answer : Paradox of choice of dating apps solved by patent ⚡ WO2026082672 ⚡
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2026082672
J'ai du breveté pour te trouver et on se trouvera bientôt !
- 9 replies
upvoted an article 3 days ago
Article
Granite Embedding Multilingual R2: Open Apache 2.0 Multilingual Embeddings with 32K Context — Best Sub-100M Retrieval Quality
ibm-granite
• • 19 liked a
model 3 days ago
liked a
dataset 3 days ago
liked a
model 3 days ago
liked a
dataset 3 days ago
updated a
dataset 3 days ago
published a
dataset 3 days ago
updated a
dataset 3 days ago
published a
dataset 3 days ago
liked 2
datasets 3 days ago
liked a
dataset 4 days ago