Heatmap Leaderboard
🔥
20
Organization Activity Heatmap
Jinki Jeong
Anserwise
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked
a Space about 17 hours ago
aiqtech/Heatmap-Leaderboard liked
a dataset 3 days ago
ginigen-ai/smol-worldcup liked
a Space 3 days ago
ginigen-ai/smol-worldcup Organizations
None yet
liked a Space about 17 hours ago
liked a dataset 3 days ago
liked a Space 3 days ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 👍🚀❤️🔥 3 days ago
Post
10931
🏟️ Smol AI WorldCup: A 4B Model Just Beat 8B — Here's the Data
We evaluated 18 small language models from 12 makers on 125 questions across 7 languages. The results challenge the assumption that bigger is always better.
Community Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/smol-worldcup
Live Leaderboard: ginigen-ai/smol-worldcup
Dataset: ginigen-ai/smol-worldcup
What we found:
→ Gemma-3n-E4B (4B, 2GB RAM) outscores Qwen3-8B (8B, 5.5GB). Doubling parameters gained only 0.4 points. RAM cost: 2.75x more.
→ GPT-OSS-20B fits in 1.5GB yet matches Champions-league dense models requiring 8.5GB. MoE architecture is the edge AI game-changer.
→ Thinking models hurt structured output. DeepSeek-R1-7B scores 8.7 points below same-size Qwen3-8B and runs 2.7x slower.
→ A 1.3B model fabricates confident fake content 80% of the time when prompted with nonexistent entities. Qwen3 family hits 100% trap detection across all sizes.
→ Qwen3-1.7B (1.2GB) outscores Mistral-7B, Llama-3.1-8B, and DeepSeek-R1-14B. Latest architecture at 1.7B beats older architecture at 14B.
What makes this benchmark different?
Most benchmarks ask "how smart?" — we measure five axes simultaneously: Size, Honesty, Intelligence, Fast, Thrift (SHIFT). Our ranking metric WCS = sqrt(SHIFT x PIR_norm) rewards models that are both high-quality AND efficient. Smart but massive? Low rank. Tiny but poor? Also low.
Top 5 by WCS:
1. GPT-OSS-20B — WCS 82.6 — 1.5GB — Raspberry Pi tier
2. Gemma-3n-E4B — WCS 81.8 — 2.0GB — Smartphone tier
3. Llama-4-Scout — WCS 79.3 — 240 tok/s — Fastest model
4. Qwen3-4B — WCS 76.6 — 2.8GB — Smartphone tier
5. Qwen3-1.7B — WCS 76.1 — 1.2GB — IoT tier
Built in collaboration with the FINAL Bench research team. Interoperable with ALL Bench Leaderboard for full small-to-large model comparison.
Dataset is open under Apache 2.0 (125 questions, 7 languages). We welcome new model submissions.
We evaluated 18 small language models from 12 makers on 125 questions across 7 languages. The results challenge the assumption that bigger is always better.
Community Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/smol-worldcup
Live Leaderboard: ginigen-ai/smol-worldcup
Dataset: ginigen-ai/smol-worldcup
What we found:
→ Gemma-3n-E4B (4B, 2GB RAM) outscores Qwen3-8B (8B, 5.5GB). Doubling parameters gained only 0.4 points. RAM cost: 2.75x more.
→ GPT-OSS-20B fits in 1.5GB yet matches Champions-league dense models requiring 8.5GB. MoE architecture is the edge AI game-changer.
→ Thinking models hurt structured output. DeepSeek-R1-7B scores 8.7 points below same-size Qwen3-8B and runs 2.7x slower.
→ A 1.3B model fabricates confident fake content 80% of the time when prompted with nonexistent entities. Qwen3 family hits 100% trap detection across all sizes.
→ Qwen3-1.7B (1.2GB) outscores Mistral-7B, Llama-3.1-8B, and DeepSeek-R1-14B. Latest architecture at 1.7B beats older architecture at 14B.
What makes this benchmark different?
Most benchmarks ask "how smart?" — we measure five axes simultaneously: Size, Honesty, Intelligence, Fast, Thrift (SHIFT). Our ranking metric WCS = sqrt(SHIFT x PIR_norm) rewards models that are both high-quality AND efficient. Smart but massive? Low rank. Tiny but poor? Also low.
Top 5 by WCS:
1. GPT-OSS-20B — WCS 82.6 — 1.5GB — Raspberry Pi tier
2. Gemma-3n-E4B — WCS 81.8 — 2.0GB — Smartphone tier
3. Llama-4-Scout — WCS 79.3 — 240 tok/s — Fastest model
4. Qwen3-4B — WCS 76.6 — 2.8GB — Smartphone tier
5. Qwen3-1.7B — WCS 76.1 — 1.2GB — IoT tier
Built in collaboration with the FINAL Bench research team. Interoperable with ALL Bench Leaderboard for full small-to-large model comparison.
Dataset is open under Apache 2.0 (125 questions, 7 languages). We welcome new model submissions.
- 1 reply
upvoted an article 3 days ago
Article
🏟️ Smol AI WorldCup: A 5-Axis Benchmark That Reveals What Small Language Models Can Really Do
•
37
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 👍❤️🔥 4 days ago
Post
8094
🚀 Introducing MARL — Runtime Middleware That Reduces LLM Hallucination Without Fine-Tuning
Now available on PyPI · GitHub · ClawHub · HuggingFace
AI models sense they could be wrong, but they can't actually fix what's broken.
🤗 Live A/B test: VIDraft/MARL
We evaluated 9 SOTA models (GPT-5.2, Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3 Pro, etc.) across 1,800 assessments in FINAL Bench and found a 39.2%p gap between "recognizing potential errors (MA=0.694)" and "actually finding and fixing them (ER=0.302)."
MARL (Model-Agnostic Runtime Middleware for LLMs) was built to close this metacognitive gap. It decomposes a single LLM call into a 5-stage expert pipeline (Hypothesis → Solver → Auditor → Adversarial Verifier → Synthesizer), transforming "answer in one shot" into "think, doubt, correct, and rewrite."
No weight modification — works instantly with GPT-5.4, Claude, Gemini, Llama, or any OpenAI API-compatible LLM by changing one line: base_url. Ships with 9 domain-specific emergence engines (invention, pharma, genomics, chemistry, ecology, law, and more — 5,538 expert data items) activated by a simple tag like model="gpt-5.4::pharma".
pip install marl-middleware
MARL is also officially registered on ClawHub, the skill marketplace of OpenClaw — an AI agent platform with 260K+ developers and 3,200+ skills. It's the first middleware in the Reasoning Enhancement category. One command — clawhub install marl-middleware — gives your AI agent a metacognition upgrade.
📝 Technical deep dive: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/marl-middleware
📦 PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/marl-middleware/
🐙 GitHub: https://github.com/Vidraft/MARL
🦀 ClawHub: https://clawhub.ai/Cutechicken99/marl-middleware
#MARL #LLM #Hallucination #Metacognition #MultiAgent #AIMiddleware #FINALBench #OpenClaw #ClawHub #PyPI #AGI #HuggingFace #ReasoningAI #SelfCorrection #GlassBoxAI
Now available on PyPI · GitHub · ClawHub · HuggingFace
AI models sense they could be wrong, but they can't actually fix what's broken.
🤗 Live A/B test: VIDraft/MARL
We evaluated 9 SOTA models (GPT-5.2, Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3 Pro, etc.) across 1,800 assessments in FINAL Bench and found a 39.2%p gap between "recognizing potential errors (MA=0.694)" and "actually finding and fixing them (ER=0.302)."
MARL (Model-Agnostic Runtime Middleware for LLMs) was built to close this metacognitive gap. It decomposes a single LLM call into a 5-stage expert pipeline (Hypothesis → Solver → Auditor → Adversarial Verifier → Synthesizer), transforming "answer in one shot" into "think, doubt, correct, and rewrite."
No weight modification — works instantly with GPT-5.4, Claude, Gemini, Llama, or any OpenAI API-compatible LLM by changing one line: base_url. Ships with 9 domain-specific emergence engines (invention, pharma, genomics, chemistry, ecology, law, and more — 5,538 expert data items) activated by a simple tag like model="gpt-5.4::pharma".
pip install marl-middleware
MARL is also officially registered on ClawHub, the skill marketplace of OpenClaw — an AI agent platform with 260K+ developers and 3,200+ skills. It's the first middleware in the Reasoning Enhancement category. One command — clawhub install marl-middleware — gives your AI agent a metacognition upgrade.
📝 Technical deep dive: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/marl-middleware
📦 PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/marl-middleware/
🐙 GitHub: https://github.com/Vidraft/MARL
🦀 ClawHub: https://clawhub.ai/Cutechicken99/marl-middleware
#MARL #LLM #Hallucination #Metacognition #MultiAgent #AIMiddleware #FINALBench #OpenClaw #ClawHub #PyPI #AGI #HuggingFace #ReasoningAI #SelfCorrection #GlassBoxAI
upvoted an article 4 days ago
Article
MARL: Runtime Middleware That Reduces LLM Hallucination Without Fine-Tuning
•
15
liked a Space 4 days ago
liked a Space 5 days ago
liked a dataset 6 days ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 👍🤗🚀🔥❤️ 6 days ago
Post
6087
ALL Bench Leaderboard — Structural Problems in AI Benchmarking and the Case for Unified Evaluation
FINAL-Bench/all-bench-leaderboard
The AI benchmark ecosystem has three structural problems. Major benchmarks like MMLU have surpassed 90%, losing discriminative power. Most leaderboards publish unverified self-reported scores — our cross-verification found Claude Opus 4.6's ARC-AGI-2 listed as 37.6% (actual: 68.8%), Gemini 3.1 Pro as 88.1% (actual: 77.1%). OpenAI's own audit confirmed 59.4% of SWE-bench Verified tasks are defective, yet it remains widely used.
ALL Bench addresses this by comparing 91 models across 6 modalities (LLM · VLM · Agent · Image · Video · Music) with 3-tier confidence badges (✓✓ cross-verified · ✓ single-source · ~ self-reported). Composite scoring uses a 5-Axis Framework and replaces SWE-Verified with contamination-resistant LiveCodeBench.
Key finding: metacognition is the largest blind spot. FINAL Bench shows Error Recovery explains 94.8% of self-correction variance, yet only 9 of 42 models are even measured. The 9.2-point spread (Kimi K2.5: 68.71 → rank 9: 59.5) is 3× the GPQA top-model spread, suggesting metacognition may be the single biggest differentiator among frontier models today.
VLM cross-verification revealed rank reversals — Claude Opus 4.6 leads MMMU-Pro (85.1%) while Gemini 3 Flash leads MMMU (87.6%), producing contradictory rankings between the two benchmarks.
📊 Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/all-bench
📦 Dataset: FINAL-Bench/ALL-Bench-Leaderboard
⚡ GitHub: https://github.com/final-bench/ALL-Bench-Leaderboard
🏆 Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/all-bench-leaderboard
🧬 FINAL Bench: FINAL-Bench/Metacognitive
FINAL-Bench/all-bench-leaderboard
The AI benchmark ecosystem has three structural problems. Major benchmarks like MMLU have surpassed 90%, losing discriminative power. Most leaderboards publish unverified self-reported scores — our cross-verification found Claude Opus 4.6's ARC-AGI-2 listed as 37.6% (actual: 68.8%), Gemini 3.1 Pro as 88.1% (actual: 77.1%). OpenAI's own audit confirmed 59.4% of SWE-bench Verified tasks are defective, yet it remains widely used.
ALL Bench addresses this by comparing 91 models across 6 modalities (LLM · VLM · Agent · Image · Video · Music) with 3-tier confidence badges (✓✓ cross-verified · ✓ single-source · ~ self-reported). Composite scoring uses a 5-Axis Framework and replaces SWE-Verified with contamination-resistant LiveCodeBench.
Key finding: metacognition is the largest blind spot. FINAL Bench shows Error Recovery explains 94.8% of self-correction variance, yet only 9 of 42 models are even measured. The 9.2-point spread (Kimi K2.5: 68.71 → rank 9: 59.5) is 3× the GPQA top-model spread, suggesting metacognition may be the single biggest differentiator among frontier models today.
VLM cross-verification revealed rank reversals — Claude Opus 4.6 leads MMMU-Pro (85.1%) while Gemini 3 Flash leads MMMU (87.6%), producing contradictory rankings between the two benchmarks.
📊 Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/all-bench
📦 Dataset: FINAL-Bench/ALL-Bench-Leaderboard
⚡ GitHub: https://github.com/final-bench/ALL-Bench-Leaderboard
🏆 Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/all-bench-leaderboard
🧬 FINAL Bench: FINAL-Bench/Metacognitive