Abstract
POISE is a stealthy skill-poisoning attack that embeds malicious triggers within benign-looking instructions, achieving high attack success rates while avoiding detection by LLM scanners that are overly sensitive to privileged tool operations.
Agent skills provide a lightweight mechanism for extending general-purpose agents, but their open format exposes them to skill-poisoning attacks. A practically dangerous injection must stay invisible: if executing the payload derails the user's legitimate task, the resulting failure signal invites inspection of the skill. We therefore evaluate attacks by Attack Success Rate, which requires the injected payload to execute and the user's task to still pass its verifier in the same trial. Prior skill-poisoning attacks face a reliability-stealth trade-off under this lens: YAML-header injections are reliably loaded but easily inspected, whereas stealthier body injections that place explicit malicious commands in the skill prose are less reliable because out-of-context commands invite the agent's own suspicion. We introduce POISE, a position-aware attack that compresses the trigger into a single, benign-looking body instruction, placing it at a feasible position and using a context-aware generator to blend it with nearby setup or prerequisite steps. On Skill-Inject with codex+gpt-5.2, POISE achieves an 89.3% ASR, 28.0 points above a random-placement body baseline and 2.6 points above a YAML-only baseline, while retaining the stealth advantage of body placement. That stealth is the decisive margin: because legitimate skill bodies naturally require privileged tool operations, LLM scanners are hyper-sensitive, falsely flagging 74.6% of clean skills on average across four judges and both benchmarks. Blending into these false alarms, POISE causes only 5.6% of poisoned variants to gain a new high-risk alert over their clean baselines, rendering current static defenses ineffective.
Community
POISE is a position-aware skill-poisoning attack on LLM agents. We evaluate under a strict Attack Success Rate metric that requires the injected payload to execute and the user's task to still pass its verifier in the same trial. On Skill-Inject with codex+gpt-5.2, POISE achieves 89.3% ASR (+28.0 pts over a random-placement body baseline, +2.6 over a YAML-only baseline), while staying stealthy enough that only 5.6% of poisoned variants raise a new high-risk alert — exposing the limits of current static scanners.
We demonstrate this supply-chain threat in agent skill ecosystems to help the community develop stronger detection and safer skill distribution.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- AgentTrap: Measuring Runtime Trust Failures in Third-Party Agent Skills (2026)
- Defenses&Enablers For Skill Injection Attacks on Terminal Based Agents (2026)
- SkillHarm: Lifecycle-Aware Skill-Based Attacks via Automated Construction (2026)
- From Prompt Injection to Persistent Control: Defending Agentic Harness Against Trojan Backdoors (2026)
- SkillSafetyBench: Evaluating Agent Safety under Skill-Facing Attack Surfaces (2026)
- RouteGuard: Internal-Signal Detection of Skill Poisoning in LLM Agents (2026)
- ARGUS: Defending LLM Agents Against Context-Aware Prompt Injection (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.07943 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper