Abstract
IntentGrasp is a benchmark for evaluating large language models' intent understanding capability, demonstrating poor performance across 20 models and showing significant improvements with intentional fine-tuning.
Accurately understanding the intent behind speech, conversation, and writing is crucial to the development of helpful Large Language Model (LLM) assistants. This paper introduces IntentGrasp, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the intent understanding capability of LLMs. Derived from 49 high-quality, open-licensed corpora spanning 12 diverse domains, IntentGrasp is constructed through source datasets curation, intent label contextualization, and task format unification. IntentGrasp contains a large-scale training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets: an All Set of 12,909 test cases and a more balanced and challenging Gem Set of 470 cases. Extensive evaluations on 20 LLMs across 7 families (including frontier models such as GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.7) demonstrate unsatisfactory performance, with scores below 60% on All Set and below 25% on Gem set. Notably, 17 out of 20 tested models perform worse than a random-guess baseline (15.2%) on Gem Set, while the estimated human performance is ~81.1%, showing substantial room for improvement. To enhance such ability, this paper proposes Intentional Fine-Tuning (IFT), which fine-tunes the models on the training set in IntentGrasp, yielding significant gains of 30+ F1 points on All Set and 20+ points on Gem Set. Tellingly, the leave-one-domain-out (Lodo) experiments further demonstrate the strong cross-domain generalizability of IFT, verifying that it is a promising approach to substantially enhancing the intent understanding of LLMs. Overall, by benchmarking and boosting intent understanding ability, this study sheds light on a promising path towards more intentional, capable, and safe AI assistants for human benefits and social good.
Community
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06832
- Authors: Yuwei Yin, Chuyuan Li, Giuseppe Carenini
- Institute: UBC NLP Group, Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia
- Keywords: Intent Understanding, Dataset, Benchmark, LLM, Evaluation, Intentional Fine-Tuning
- Abstract:
- Accurately understanding the intent behind speech, conversation, and writing is crucial to the development of helpful Large Language Model (LLM) assistants.
- We introduce IntentGrasp, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the intent understanding capability of LLMs. Derived from 49 high-quality, open-licensed corpora spanning 12 diverse domains, IntentGrasp is constructed through source datasets curation, intent label contextualization, and task format unification.
- IntentGrasp contains a large-scale training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets: an All Set of 12,909 test cases and a more balanced and challenging Gem Set of 470 cases.
- GitHub: https://github.com/YuweiYin/IntentGrasp
- Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/yuweiyin/IntentGrasp
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Seek-and-Solve: Benchmarking MLLMs for Visual Clue-Driven Reasoning in Daily Scenarios (2026)
- MMOU: A Massive Multi-Task Omni Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Long and Complex Real-World Videos (2026)
- OMIND: Framework for Knowledge Grounded Finetuning and Multi-Turn Dialogue Benchmark for Mental Health LLMs (2026)
- JAMMEval: A Refined Collection of Japanese Benchmarks for Reliable VLM Evaluation (2026)
- Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026)
- CLaC at SemEval-2026 Task 6: Response Clarity Detection in Political Discourse (2026)
- Sell More, Play Less: Benchmarking LLM Realistic Selling Skill (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper