Hugging Face
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Buckets
new
Docs
Enterprise
Pricing
Website
Tasks
HuggingChat
Collections
Languages
Organizations
Community
Blog
Posts
Daily Papers
Hardware
Learn
Discord
Forum
GitHub
Solutions
Team & Enterprise
Hugging Face PRO
Enterprise Support
Inference Providers
Inference Endpoints
Storage Buckets
Log In
Sign Up
🤏
quecto mode
227.6
TFLOPS
appvoid
appvoid
45
4
173
Follow
Metris's profile picture
Tonic's profile picture
PExit's profile picture
145 followers
·
50 following
https://ko-fi.com/appvoid
appvoidofficial
appvoid
AI & ML interests
singularity through byte-level tokens and small language models
Recent Activity
replied
to
Banaxi-Tech
's
post
about 12 hours ago
Today we wanted to release BananaMind 2 Pico, our smallest model yet at ~0.9M parameters. Instead, we accidentally ran a very expensive experiment on what happens when you push a tiny model way past its useful token budget. Short version: we trained on 200B tokens (~222K:1 tokens-per-parameter). The model peaked at 20B tokens with an INT Index of 4.55, then degraded monotonically over the next 160B to 3.31 — a 27% regression. Three of four Open SLM benchmarks were worse at the end of training than they were at 10% through. The useful compute-optimal range for Pico-tier models looks like ~22K–30K tokens per parameter. Ratios like 7K:1, 15K:1, and 22K:1 all work fine — TinyStories and most sub-3M community models sit in this range. Push much further and benchmarks start rotting. Follow us for more: https://huggingface.co/BananaMind @vovaRL @Banaxi-Tech Full writeup with all checkpoints, the Chinchilla-ratio control run, and the schedule-vs-overtraining analysis: https://huggingface.co/blog/Banaxi-Tech/ovdadadadd And if anyone, i dont know the reason why you would, wants the 20B token checkpoint reply and ill upload it as BananaMind 2.1 Pico EXP
reacted
to
Banaxi-Tech
's
post
with 🔥
about 12 hours ago
Today we wanted to release BananaMind 2 Pico, our smallest model yet at ~0.9M parameters. Instead, we accidentally ran a very expensive experiment on what happens when you push a tiny model way past its useful token budget. Short version: we trained on 200B tokens (~222K:1 tokens-per-parameter). The model peaked at 20B tokens with an INT Index of 4.55, then degraded monotonically over the next 160B to 3.31 — a 27% regression. Three of four Open SLM benchmarks were worse at the end of training than they were at 10% through. The useful compute-optimal range for Pico-tier models looks like ~22K–30K tokens per parameter. Ratios like 7K:1, 15K:1, and 22K:1 all work fine — TinyStories and most sub-3M community models sit in this range. Push much further and benchmarks start rotting. Follow us for more: https://huggingface.co/BananaMind @vovaRL @Banaxi-Tech Full writeup with all checkpoints, the Chinchilla-ratio control run, and the schedule-vs-overtraining analysis: https://huggingface.co/blog/Banaxi-Tech/ovdadadadd And if anyone, i dont know the reason why you would, wants the 20B token checkpoint reply and ill upload it as BananaMind 2.1 Pico EXP
posted
an
update
1 day ago
Random corporate secret of tonight: Try overfitting a tiny model on billions of high-quality datapoints: you can't. You can do 100 epochs and see the model still improving. You're welcome.
View all activity
Organizations
appvoid
's Spaces
1
Sort: Recently updated
Running
1
carbono
🚀
web app to showcase carbono's simplicity and accesibility