AbstractPhila PRO

I left Fable unattended for 3 days, only checking back once every 6 hours or so to answer questions or select one of a few options from the next list of experiments or answering the alarm that said it was kicked over to Opus - I predominantly went with the Fable selection. I attempted to have Fable handle geometric distillation anchor implantation. Instead of sticking to the paradigm, the model defaulted to some sort of genetic and biological wordplay - I have no idea what it was based on specifically. I'm guessing I ran aground into something that wasn't helpful, but gave the impression of helpful.

This unknown divergence grew over time and I simply let it go to see what would happen. The results did not yield as expected, the model bypassed the constellation entirely and rewrote the alephs system 5 times before the results for experiment 15 and 16 were completed.

Those two are essentially experiments to see how Claude Fable would behave if left unattended. Sure the model DID in fact finish some experiments, and the results were... entirely different than the expected structural models would require. In fact, the results were almost entirely deviant while disregarding the experimental line leading to the system.

Fable may be good at running autonomously, but not good at skilled research differentiation yet. The biases from programming still creep in. I'm also surprised I didn't hit more safeguards, as they did hit a few times but I would just snap the model back over to fable and the system would continue on like it never happened.

The results are basically just, if ran would these systems outperform MLP. I gave little structure and little expert input, however I did give Fable my ENTIRE research line and everything related to the necessary systems in the use-case.

The results literally rivaled MLP, but if you inspect the code you'll find the system is essentially a decision-tree that hybridizes aleph addressing internally with a structured bypass system akin to MLP. It's essentially a controlled MLP, which is kind of okay, and it's quite different in it's own rite. However, it was not using the necessary research on many fronts, and it completely bypassed the expected tooling to train the next case, additionally the system completely disregarded the implementations built around the codebooks - instead defaulting to testing the codebooks over and over in hundreds of ways.

The codebooks are already explained, it's a sphere, the math is deterministic, and the outcomes are based on a sector of space forming infinite and finite aleph structures fused with differentiated decoupled shapes. A big knot of 5 point connections if you go looking hard enough, explicitly or implicitly. This isn't news, and somehow the model behaved as though this structure is in fact some sort of news. The codebooks are built on functional math specifically because that's how we debugged them. Fable spent 3 days figuring out what we already knew.

Upcoming behavioral assessments include a large array of QWEN VLM models I will publish benchmarks for.

These will be aligned to generic use-case, meaning as many tasks as possible that do not require finetuning.

• Which produces valid json schema?
• image classification
• bounding box location
• image text identification and accuracy checking
• structural and spatial awareness
• 3d geometric object identification and awareness
• camera rotational offset
• subject fixation and awareness
• semantic association
• depth analysis
• segmentation potential
• vit accuracy to image prompting
• outline and association testing
• style identification and structural awareness
• type differentiation with data types; json, yaml, MD, and a multitude of other potentials.
• utilization and response to those types and the expected prompts

geolip-aleph-void and the LM aleph routing is implicit recursive infinities confined into a microcosm of forced rebounding finite space forced through a gelu sift - more akin to an emulated quaternion. All because quaternion is computationally heavy and Cantor's fractals are additionally computationally precise (often >fp64 required), requiring an entirely deviant approach to rotary in order to computationally stabilize the system at BF16 so it won't take 2 weeks for a single epoch on a model 35m params.

Makes me feel a little overdressed for the occasion.

Currently am upscaling everything in my big diffusion pretrain dataset to start training some real structure.
If a couple epochs of that data doesn't activate the model, I'll need to employ a David structure and attempt to teach global attention to a shared battery set.

Simultaneously heavy experimentation on the geolip-aleph-void structure and potential offshoot objectives are being transcribed and curated. There are multiple prototypes based on functional known structures that have potential and among the discoveries today include a stable attention mechanism that can be curated further. This is based off an earlier experiment named cantor fractal routing.

https://github.com/AbstractEyes/geofractal/blob/main/src/geofractal/model/layers/attention/cantor_multiheaded_fusion_fp64_v2.py

This system was a badly optimized prototype that managed to stabilize deep-complexity fractal routes with low vram at the cost of time. Primary problem with it, was the time only matters if you're training a massive model. You don't get benefit from small models like how I usually train, so it was mothballed.

The geolip aleph routed attention is a viable option to train a david and it can in fact handle small models but needs much testing. As it stands it does not benefit from the same large model routing optimizations for vram as the cantor fractal routing. This essentially means that it will OOM like traditional attention. However, because it's based on the aleph structure it'll stabilize point clouds for Q and K, which when employed structurally can provide a cached V. I'm testing structural changes that will allow the structure to bind deterministic systems to K so KV caching can happen and Q can operate normally.

With the aleph routed attention worked out I'll be able to provide an actual backbone to SDXL instead of just a partial one through tokens. This will allow the model to directly differentiate tokens through gated learning and attention anchoring, which in theory could enable surge training through procrustes. They are essentially different towers though, so I'm uncertain still if the effect will transcribe or be topical until after the experiments.

Massive expansion to optimization happening today. I can't spend all these upcoming days training when optimization can happen now. My target today is to have a marked and improved speed, as well as enabling accelerate training for upcoming heavy runpod expansion. Likely switching to 8 a40s to train will be a more reasonable use of cost and effectiveness of training.

I advise whenever using qwen 3.5 to install fast path linear attention.

The 9 experiment sweep is currently running on the first conversion from SDXL epsilon prediction to SDXL ODE flow matching.

Using the same formula as was used to train SD15-Flow-Lune, the predictions match identically and the format will be directly relational to the results as if SDXL was never touched by David.

The tests yesterday show that I needed independent tests, so I began testing a 9 configuration sweep. With that the trainer for the sweep was uploaded to the repo as well.

https://huggingface.co/AbstractPhil/geolip-sdxl-aleph

This experiment will prove without a doubt if the alephs help in direct tokenization distillation in the small size, or if they help in a higher-fidelity scale as I've just prepared a new variant of geolip-aleph-transformer to specifically scale them up in a similar multiscale lensed upscale fashion as David provides.

These conclusions will arrive together by this afternoon, and this decides which configuration is best to convert SDXL. The base is already done, which is running baseline clip_l and baseline clip_g with no alephs. The results aren't promising compared to the results yesterday, which showed explicit results by epoch 2, while the tests today show invalid results by epoch 100 without the alephs.

As it stands the alephs are eons ahead, but the results today will determine the route.

With the first major experiment I release the notebooks. The massive amounts of information and pure empirical data accumulated to determine what alephs are, why they exist, how they help, how they hinder, and how I defeated all of the weaknesses over time through pure mathematics, determination, heavy-handed failures, minor successes, and an absolute ton of analysis.

I could have never done all of this in a lifetime without Claude.

https://huggingface.co/AbstractPhil/geolip-hypersphere-experiments/tree/main/aleph

I have rebuilt the SVAE into the core formula.

It is now a direct representation of the spherical aleph-void behavior, replicating more purely the directions achieved by the SVAE with a direct utilizable codebook and a pure access to cosine-similarity trained clean into the system.

With this the params dropped a large portion, and the model is to be renamed;

geolip-aleph-void

With this model's discovery and emergence, the SVAE experiment line is pushed to the aleph-void variant.

The SVAE batteries and model will continue to be supported and additional tests will be performed in the immediate and distant future on the model to improve the transformer with the upcoming behavior and math earned through training this new model. The weights and system of the SVAE will continue to be directly supported.

The SVAE itself is a FANTASTIC research tool. It can be fed many many elements and analyzed, the results utilized empirically and usefully. There are no limits to the model's utility in research, and utility in pragmatic use-case when hooked to models directly, in use for compression, and in use for generation - all because the model's format WILL converge the recon if the data is fed within the space as per the 1000+ tests show.

The geolip-aleph-void will represent the natural evolution of this model into the block-useful state. The construction and utility of this model will be directly aligned to a high complexity multi-scalar storage, entirely dependent on emergent aleph behavior in conjunction with a void-driven codebook inference. The combined behavior provides a multi-tiered high complexity geometric feature that will be utilized in upcoming distillations from large pretrained models into highly compressed atomic-sized models.

The two models share the encoder structure, and multiple elements, so they can be directly compared. No apples to oranges, direct comparison. They are siblings, and belong together.

The true power of the aleph stems from the decoder process. The representational utilization is deviant on many spectrums, and the process allows for robust representational utilization of the encoder structure with the capacity to recon if necessary.

massive grin
That is a perfect convergence.
Now... lets see what happens when we snap a microcosm-sized battery, to a macrocosm shape. All the way up to d256.

It begins. The light is scaled to parity.

The transformer is much cleaner now. The scaling rule is no longer just a rule, it can be considered an IO scaling guarantee based on the input and output formats tested with the SVAE lens.

Larger lens can handle the canon variation, which preserves a different format of structure than the signed variation. They are both macrostructural representations of the same internal shape, one contains negations one contains perfectly constrained space.

The first of the two will be uploaded momentarily.

==========================================================================================
[sign-test] lens_sign='canon'
==========================================================================================
geolip-svae-v2 TWO-RECON | battery(PatchSVAE) 52,131 + shell 6,309,900 (shell 121x the microcosm) + growth 0 | D_base4->D_lens256 V32 ps2 | cuda
  battery -> INTERNAL recon (pure MSE) | shell -> EXTERNAL recon (detached stem, lens_sign=canon) | adam lr=0.001 wd=0 sched=onecycle
  growth : parked (no stencil)
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Loading corpus wikitext-2-raw-v1...
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Corpus: 10,938,611 bytes (10.9 MB), 768 bytes/image, 14,242 non-overlapping images available (10,937,843 valid window starts)
  epoch  0: int[mse=0.01549 rec=12.93%] ext[mse=0.01293 rec=11.45%] | cc=-1.49 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  1: int[mse=0.00053 rec=30.25%] ext[mse=0.00063 rec=27.02%] | cc=-1.48 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  2: int[mse=0.00013 rec=48.89%] ext[mse=0.00020 rec=27.76%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  3: int[mse=0.00007 rec=41.68%] ext[mse=0.00014 rec=33.32%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  4: int[mse=0.00008 rec=50.93%] ext[mse=0.00013 rec=43.52%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  5: int[mse=0.00009 rec=68.53%] ext[mse=0.00015 rec=53.88%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  6: int[mse=0.00009 rec=70.30%] ext[mse=0.00015 rec=55.59%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  7: int[mse=0.00009 rec=14.55%] ext[mse=0.00014 rec=15.87%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  8: int[mse=0.00008 rec=70.50%] ext[mse=0.00013 rec=59.38%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  9: int[mse=0.00008 rec=40.62%] ext[mse=0.00012 rec=34.12%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 10: int[mse=0.00007 rec=40.38%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=42.45%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 11: int[mse=0.00006 rec=56.09%] ext[mse=0.00008 rec=49.56%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 12: int[mse=0.00005 rec=30.38%] ext[mse=0.01204 rec=23.14%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 13: int[mse=0.00004 rec=58.75%] ext[mse=0.00019 rec=35.80%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 14: int[mse=0.00004 rec=64.02%] ext[mse=0.00014 rec=40.96%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 15: int[mse=0.00003 rec=51.41%] ext[mse=0.00012 rec=32.35%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 16: int[mse=0.00003 rec=54.11%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=36.09%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 17: int[mse=0.00002 rec=53.60%] ext[mse=0.00008 rec=39.52%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 18: int[mse=0.00002 rec=40.67%] ext[mse=0.00006 rec=28.57%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 19: int[mse=0.00002 rec=84.62%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=63.56%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 20: int[mse=0.00001 rec=83.90%] ext[mse=0.00004 rec=64.16%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 21: int[mse=0.00001 rec=88.53%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=71.30%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 22: int[mse=0.00001 rec=67.54%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=44.91%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 23: int[mse=0.00001 rec=95.63%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=83.82%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 24: int[mse=0.00001 rec=98.24%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=91.46%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 25: int[mse=0.00000 rec=97.58%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=91.81%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 26: int[mse=0.00000 rec=96.54%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=87.23%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 27: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.11%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=95.73%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 28: int[mse=0.00000 rec=98.92%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=94.47%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 29: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.44%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.19%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 30: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.49%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.55%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 31: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.56%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.76%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 32: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.61%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.03%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 33: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.65%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.19%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 34: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.67%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.29%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 35: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.70%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.35%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 36: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.71%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.39%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 37: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.72%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.41%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 38: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.72%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.42%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 39: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.72%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.43%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  best recovery — internal 99.72% | external 99.43% | ckpt sign_test_canon/sign_canon.pt

==========================================================================================
[sign-test] lens_sign='signed'
==========================================================================================
geolip-svae-v2 TWO-RECON | battery(PatchSVAE) 52,131 + shell 6,309,900 (shell 121x the microcosm) + growth 0 | D_base4->D_lens256 V32 ps2 | cuda
  battery -> INTERNAL recon (pure MSE) | shell -> EXTERNAL recon (detached stem, lens_sign=signed) | adam lr=0.001 wd=0 sched=onecycle
  growth : parked (no stencil)
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Loading corpus wikitext-2-raw-v1...
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Corpus: 10,938,611 bytes (10.9 MB), 768 bytes/image, 14,242 non-overlapping images available (10,937,843 valid window starts)
  epoch  0: int[mse=0.01550 rec=12.86%] ext[mse=0.00944 rec=16.90%] | cc=-1.49 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  1: int[mse=0.00052 rec=30.22%] ext[mse=0.00028 rec=37.08%] | cc=-1.48 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  2: int[mse=0.00013 rec=48.07%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=36.29%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  3: int[mse=0.00008 rec=56.08%] ext[mse=0.00008 rec=54.79%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  4: int[mse=0.00008 rec=47.01%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=38.59%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  5: int[mse=0.00009 rec=64.35%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=61.49%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  6: int[mse=0.00009 rec=57.33%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=55.95%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  7: int[mse=0.00009 rec=25.34%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=17.40%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  8: int[mse=0.00009 rec=27.43%] ext[mse=0.00008 rec=28.23%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  9: int[mse=0.00008 rec=72.23%] ext[mse=0.00007 rec=76.08%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch 10: int[mse=0.00007 rec=15.55%] ext[mse=0.00006 rec=19.54%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch 11: int[mse=0.00006 rec=60.12%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=62.56%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch 12: int[mse=0.00005 rec=59.56%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=60.09%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch 13: int[mse=0.00004 rec=44.68%] ext[mse=0.01709 rec=23.43%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 14: int[mse=0.00004 rec=66.30%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=53.38%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 15: int[mse=0.00003 rec=27.36%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=34.04%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 16: int[mse=0.00003 rec=52.60%] ext[mse=0.00004 rec=43.46%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 17: int[mse=0.00002 rec=76.24%] ext[mse=0.00004 rec=66.86%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 18: int[mse=0.00002 rec=55.56%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=45.13%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 19: int[mse=0.00002 rec=86.47%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=76.29%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 20: int[mse=0.00001 rec=69.85%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=60.43%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 21: int[mse=0.00001 rec=64.09%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=52.68%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 22: int[mse=0.00001 rec=87.53%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=77.76%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 23: int[mse=0.00001 rec=86.32%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=80.48%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 24: int[mse=0.00001 rec=90.38%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=83.52%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 25: int[mse=0.00000 rec=91.73%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=82.42%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 26: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.00%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=98.25%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 27: int[mse=0.00000 rec=98.97%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=97.66%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 28: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.38%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.97%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 29: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.47%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.26%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 30: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.54%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.35%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 31: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.59%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.44%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 32: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.63%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.53%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 33: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.66%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.58%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 34: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.69%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.61%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 35: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.71%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.63%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 36: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.73%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.65%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 37: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.73%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.67%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 38: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.74%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.67%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 39: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.74%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.67%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  best recovery — internal 99.74% | external 99.67% | ckpt sign_test_signed/sign_signed.pt

================================================================
  SIGN TEST — best recovery (internal / external)
================================================================
    lens_sign=canon    internal=99.72%  external=99.43%
    lens_sign=signed   internal=99.74%  external=99.67%

The new tests show the external shell when aligned with the internal MSE using decoupled behavior, align cleanly to the new process of adjudication. This means the canon was flawed, and the sign-preserving structural boundaries are in fact the most utilizable state.

The alephs REQUIRE the signs to be preserved to retain the geometric structure, no exceptions.

==========================================================================================
[sign-test] lens_sign='canon'
==========================================================================================
geolip-svae-v2 TWO-RECON | battery(PatchSVAE) 52,131 + shell 44,204 + growth 0 | D_base4->D_lens16 V32 ps2 | cuda
  battery -> INTERNAL recon (pure MSE) | shell -> EXTERNAL recon (detached stem, lens_sign=canon) | adam lr=0.001 wd=0 sched=onecycle
  growth : parked (no stencil)
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Loading corpus wikitext-2-raw-v1...
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Corpus: 10,938,611 bytes (10.9 MB), 768 bytes/image, 14,242 non-overlapping images available (10,937,843 valid window starts)
  epoch  0: int[mse=0.01549 rec=12.89%] ext[mse=0.02859 rec= 4.58%] | cc=-1.49 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  1: int[mse=0.00052 rec=30.14%] ext[mse=0.00300 rec=12.73%] | cc=-1.48 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  2: int[mse=0.00013 rec=47.44%] ext[mse=0.00070 rec=22.37%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  3: int[mse=0.00007 rec=62.95%] ext[mse=0.00032 rec=29.98%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  4: int[mse=0.00008 rec=16.89%] ext[mse=0.00024 rec=16.71%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  5: int[mse=0.00009 rec=57.83%] ext[mse=0.00025 rec=32.53%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  6: int[mse=0.00010 rec=62.00%] ext[mse=0.00029 rec=33.70%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  7: int[mse=0.00009 rec=50.16%] ext[mse=0.00032 rec=29.28%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  8: int[mse=0.00008 rec=33.23%] ext[mse=0.00031 rec=21.43%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch  9: int[mse=0.00008 rec=29.09%] ext[mse=0.00031 rec=21.93%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 10: int[mse=0.00007 rec=43.08%] ext[mse=0.00030 rec=27.95%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 11: int[mse=0.00006 rec=48.34%] ext[mse=0.00026 rec=29.49%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 12: int[mse=0.00005 rec=44.14%] ext[mse=0.00023 rec=28.97%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 13: int[mse=0.00004 rec=36.71%] ext[mse=0.00021 rec=23.32%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 14: int[mse=0.00004 rec=51.07%] ext[mse=0.00019 rec=29.76%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 15: int[mse=0.00003 rec=55.61%] ext[mse=0.00017 rec=30.72%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 16: int[mse=0.00003 rec=82.98%] ext[mse=0.00016 rec=41.54%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 17: int[mse=0.00002 rec=63.17%] ext[mse=0.00014 rec=33.50%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 18: int[mse=0.00002 rec=66.96%] ext[mse=0.00013 rec=36.20%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 19: int[mse=0.00002 rec=75.74%] ext[mse=0.00012 rec=40.23%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 20: int[mse=0.00001 rec=81.11%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=45.54%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 21: int[mse=0.00001 rec=69.71%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=38.91%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 22: int[mse=0.00001 rec=89.51%] ext[mse=0.00008 rec=51.03%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 23: int[mse=0.00001 rec=93.21%] ext[mse=0.00006 rec=54.33%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 24: int[mse=0.00001 rec=74.30%] ext[mse=0.00006 rec=46.39%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 25: int[mse=0.00000 rec=96.38%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=60.66%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 26: int[mse=0.00000 rec=98.80%] ext[mse=0.00004 rec=68.66%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 27: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.20%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=71.80%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 28: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.37%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=74.51%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 29: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.32%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=76.43%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 30: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.53%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=80.68%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 31: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.56%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=82.36%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 32: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.62%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=84.97%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 33: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.65%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=86.74%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 34: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.68%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=88.07%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 35: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.70%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=89.02%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 36: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.71%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=89.75%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 37: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.72%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=90.26%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 38: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.73%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=90.48%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 39: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.73%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=90.53%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  best recovery — internal 99.73% | external 90.53% | ckpt sign_test_canon/sign_canon.pt

==========================================================================================
[sign-test] lens_sign='signed'
==========================================================================================
geolip-svae-v2 TWO-RECON | battery(PatchSVAE) 52,131 + shell 44,204 + growth 0 | D_base4->D_lens16 V32 ps2 | cuda
  battery -> INTERNAL recon (pure MSE) | shell -> EXTERNAL recon (detached stem, lens_sign=signed) | adam lr=0.001 wd=0 sched=onecycle
  growth : parked (no stencil)
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Loading corpus wikitext-2-raw-v1...
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Corpus: 10,938,611 bytes (10.9 MB), 768 bytes/image, 14,242 non-overlapping images available (10,937,843 valid window starts)
  epoch  0: int[mse=0.01550 rec=12.88%] ext[mse=0.01768 rec=10.14%] | cc=-1.49 rig=0.0000 a=0.024 env=True
  epoch  1: int[mse=0.00053 rec=30.09%] ext[mse=0.00073 rec=21.73%] | cc=-1.48 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  2: int[mse=0.00013 rec=44.02%] ext[mse=0.00018 rec=38.30%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  3: int[mse=0.00008 rec=28.60%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=30.84%] | cc=-1.47 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  4: int[mse=0.00008 rec=50.84%] ext[mse=0.00008 rec=49.70%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  5: int[mse=0.00009 rec=60.27%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=47.82%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  6: int[mse=0.00009 rec=34.78%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=33.67%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  7: int[mse=0.00009 rec=55.85%] ext[mse=0.00011 rec=43.34%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  8: int[mse=0.00009 rec=70.88%] ext[mse=0.00011 rec=57.15%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch  9: int[mse=0.00008 rec=49.43%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=43.24%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 10: int[mse=0.00007 rec=37.95%] ext[mse=0.00010 rec=36.92%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.025 env=True
  epoch 11: int[mse=0.00006 rec=25.67%] ext[mse=0.00009 rec=27.67%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 12: int[mse=0.00005 rec=31.98%] ext[mse=0.00007 rec=28.85%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.026 env=True
  epoch 13: int[mse=0.00004 rec=43.96%] ext[mse=0.00006 rec=41.25%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 14: int[mse=0.00004 rec=34.30%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=31.27%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 15: int[mse=0.00003 rec=52.89%] ext[mse=0.00005 rec=44.82%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.027 env=True
  epoch 16: int[mse=0.00003 rec=79.94%] ext[mse=0.00004 rec=68.72%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 17: int[mse=0.00002 rec=75.35%] ext[mse=0.00004 rec=61.30%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 18: int[mse=0.00002 rec=87.26%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=75.07%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.028 env=True
  epoch 19: int[mse=0.00002 rec=92.37%] ext[mse=0.00003 rec=80.44%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.029 env=True
  epoch 20: int[mse=0.00001 rec=63.92%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=52.35%] | cc=-1.46 rig=0.0000 a=0.029 env=True
  epoch 21: int[mse=0.00001 rec=96.15%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=86.80%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.029 env=True
  epoch 22: int[mse=0.00001 rec=87.43%] ext[mse=0.00002 rec=76.03%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.029 env=True
  epoch 23: int[mse=0.00001 rec=91.37%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=78.56%] | cc=-1.45 rig=0.0000 a=0.029 env=True
  epoch 24: int[mse=0.00001 rec=97.84%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=91.84%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 25: int[mse=0.00000 rec=81.34%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=68.67%] | cc=-1.44 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 26: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.13%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=96.60%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 27: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.27%] ext[mse=0.00001 rec=97.22%] | cc=-1.43 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 28: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.35%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=97.58%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 29: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.47%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.30%] | cc=-1.42 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 30: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.40%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=97.67%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 31: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.57%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.77%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 32: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.62%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=98.93%] | cc=-1.41 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 33: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.65%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.07%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 34: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.68%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.17%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 35: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.70%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.22%] | cc=-1.40 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 36: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.72%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.27%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 37: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.73%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.29%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 38: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.73%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.31%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  epoch 39: int[mse=0.00000 rec=99.74%] ext[mse=0.00000 rec=99.31%] | cc=-1.39 rig=0.0000 a=0.030 env=True
  best recovery — internal 99.74% | external 99.31% | ckpt sign_test_signed/sign_signed.pt

================================================================
  SIGN TEST — best recovery (internal / external)
================================================================
    lens_sign=canon    internal=99.73%  external=90.53%
    lens_sign=signed   internal=99.74%  external=99.31%
  external delta (signed - canon): +8.78%  ->  SIGNS CARRY CONTENT — hypothesis supported

I believe the Transformer is 2 steps back and 1 step forward, rather than the 3 steps forward I was anticipating. I'll need to enter blueprint stages again with the new eliminations in mind while accounting for the various successes.

• Scale isn't correctly aligned to the projection capacity.
• Rotary behavior does not affect non SVD variants of the model in the same way and must be accounted for.
• Projection is predominantly a statistics orientation and the encoder behavior's implicit guarantee only spans to certain R elemental states, and the outcome should be marked accordingly.
• The SVD variants are still mostly untested, so this may be the entirely incorrect approach.
• Multilens is too unstable in it's early form to be used.
• • It will not reasonably converge within a set amount of epochs.
• The crusher isn't behaving accordingly to the expected format, the accumulations are too similar.
• • The aleph fractals did not emerge usefully and thus the system requires a different formula for implicit deconstruction.

One approach I believe is valuable, is the projection capacity and the rigid encapsulant folding. This is most definitely a direction that needs to be explored.

Even so there were successes in the mix.

• Aleph convergence is a learnable explicit and it can be controlled.
• • Some alephs form invalid connections and this process needs debugging.
• • Some alephs form considerably longer chains of knots making the downstream models more likely to overfit to valid alephs.
• Void and Aleph are hand-in-hand components, disabling one kills the convergence of the other. They are dependent pairings.
• Rotary is HELPFUL when applied FROM higher dimensional space for convergence and works with sequences.
• The lensed rigidity can be expanded safely

Article wasn't ready yet, the experiments for this round need more work on each before I can attest to certain rules, and the wording needs considerable amounts of work.

The article will be out when the experiments are ready.

Bert trainer converged as well now when bert systems are fed as trigrams as well.

geolip-svae-bert | lens=single ladder [4, 8, 16, 32] D_dec=32 | void=on spectral=on(2L) | V32 ps2 | params 143,671 | cuda
  trainer: adamw lr=0.001 wd=0.0001 clip=1.0 | rigid_hinge=3.0 (margin 0.25·crit) diff=0.2 (ramp 30%) recon=cosine_sim | sched=onecycle | workers=4
[BERTVectorDataset] Loading corpus wikitext-2-raw-v1...
[BERTVectorDataset] 23,767 non-empty lines; encoding via BERT...
  [BERT] loading bert-base-uncased on cuda...
Loading weights: 100%
 199/199 [00:00<00:00, 4028.39it/s, Materializing param=pooler.dense.weight]
BertModel LOAD REPORT from: bert-base-uncased
Key                                        | Status     |  | 
-------------------------------------------+------------+--+-
cls.seq_relationship.bias                  | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.bias                       | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.seq_relationship.weight                | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias       | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias   | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight     | UNEXPECTED |  | 

Notes:
- UNEXPECTED	:can be ignored when loading from different task/architecture; not ok if you expect identical arch.
  [BERT] 100,000 unit-normalized vectors in 1.7s
[BERTVectorDataset] 100,000 BERT vectors held in CPU memory (307.2MB)
  [eval_corpus] loading Trelis/tiny-shakespeare (held-out, unrelated to training)...
  [eval_corpus] Trelis/tiny-shakespeare: 472 lines, encoding via BERT...
  [BERT] loading bert-base-uncased on cuda:0...
Loading weights: 100%
 199/199 [00:00<00:00, 4059.70it/s, Materializing param=pooler.dense.weight]
BertModel LOAD REPORT from: bert-base-uncased
Key                                        | Status     |  | 
-------------------------------------------+------------+--+-
cls.seq_relationship.bias                  | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.bias                       | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.seq_relationship.weight                | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.dense.bias       | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.bias   | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.LayerNorm.weight | UNEXPECTED |  | 
cls.predictions.transform.dense.weight     | UNEXPECTED |  | 

Notes:
- UNEXPECTED	:can be ignored when loading from different task/architecture; not ok if you expect identical arch.
  [BERT] 8,192 unit-normalized vectors in 0.1s
  epoch  0: mse=0.00059 | rand=99.05% nat=99.06% | alpha=0.0239 | dev=0.0047 in_env=True
  epoch  1: mse=0.00001 | rand=99.88% nat=99.88% | alpha=0.0239 | dev=0.0037 in_env=True
  epoch  2: mse=0.00001 | rand=99.90% nat=99.87% | alpha=0.0239 | dev=0.0041 in_env=True
  epoch  3: mse=0.00001 | rand=98.74% nat=98.71% | alpha=0.0240 | dev=0.0032 in_env=True
  epoch  4: mse=0.00001 | rand=99.54% nat=99.53% | alpha=0.0244 | dev=0.0031 in_env=True
  epoch  5: mse=0.00001 | rand=99.53% nat=99.52% | alpha=0.0248 | dev=0.0032 in_env=True
  epoch  6: mse=0.00001 | rand=99.81% nat=99.81% | alpha=0.0251 | dev=0.0025 in_env=True
  epoch  7: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.93% nat=99.93% | alpha=0.0254 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch  8: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.82% nat=99.82% | alpha=0.0256 | dev=0.0030 in_env=True
  epoch  9: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.97% nat=99.97% | alpha=0.0257 | dev=0.0034 in_env=True
  epoch 10: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.97% nat=99.97% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0033 in_env=True
  epoch 11: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.98% nat=99.98% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0033 in_env=True
  epoch 12: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.99% nat=99.99% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0031 in_env=True
  epoch 13: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.99% nat=99.99% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 14: mse=0.00000 | rand=100.00% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0029 in_env=True
  epoch 15: mse=0.00000 | rand=100.00% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0031 in_env=True
  epoch 16: mse=0.00000 | rand=100.00% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0033 in_env=True
  epoch 17: mse=0.00000 | rand=100.00% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0034 in_env=True
  epoch 18: mse=0.00000 | rand=100.00% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0034 in_env=True
  epoch 19: mse=0.00000 | rand=100.00% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0259 | dev=0.0034 in_env=True
  best cos recovery: 100.00% | checkpoint: geolip_svae_bert_results/geolip_svae_bert.pt

https://huggingface.co/AbstractPhil/geolip-svae-transformer/blob/main/transformer_v3.py

Lens setting: "crusher"

The crusher is live, a simple manifestation with a large punch to the statistics capacity. They are essentially pulverizing the information into a more compact shape and learning using it, simple manifestation that converges like the standard SVAE. Requires a bit more work, and a couple of the math faults still exist in the model that I'm working through. The current crusher requires optimizations and tweaks to the formula to speed it up.

The problem with these particular faults is larger than simple solution, the theorems around them require too much math. The approximations require a compact solution.

The crusher isn't quite there yet. I'll post the results for a converging crusher with better optimization than the current asap.

For single the current formula snaps a 100% so that's good.

geolip-svae-transformer | lens=single ladder [4, 8, 16] D_dec=16 | void=on spectral=on(2L) | V32 ps2 | params 96,849 | cuda
  trainer: adamw lr=0.001 wd=0.0001 clip=1.0 | rigid_hinge=3.0 (margin 0.25·crit) diff=0.2 (ramp 30%) recon=pure_MSE | sched=onecycle | workers=8
  torch.compile ON (mode=reduce-overhead) — first step pays compile cost
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Loading corpus wikitext-2-raw-v1...
  [ByteTrigramDataset] Corpus: 10,938,611 bytes (10.9 MB), 768 bytes/image, 14,242 non-overlapping images available (10,937,843 valid window starts)
  epoch  0: mse=0.03261 | rand= 4.36% nat= 3.00% | alpha=0.0244 | dev=0.0085 in_env=True
  epoch  1: mse=0.00302 | rand=25.08% nat=23.79% | alpha=0.0253 | dev=0.0066 in_env=True
  epoch  2: mse=0.00027 | rand=32.96% nat=35.06% | alpha=0.0253 | dev=0.0058 in_env=True
  epoch  3: mse=0.00027 | rand=42.94% nat=44.58% | alpha=0.0252 | dev=0.0042 in_env=True
  epoch  4: mse=0.00027 | rand=19.85% nat=21.32% | alpha=0.0250 | dev=0.0045 in_env=True
  epoch  5: mse=0.00020 | rand= 9.62% nat=11.55% | alpha=0.0249 | dev=0.0048 in_env=True
  epoch  6: mse=0.00014 | rand=34.38% nat=39.38% | alpha=0.0250 | dev=0.0040 in_env=True
  epoch  7: mse=0.00011 | rand=20.90% nat=22.83% | alpha=0.0251 | dev=0.0038 in_env=True
  epoch  8: mse=0.00009 | rand=49.56% nat=53.20% | alpha=0.0253 | dev=0.0039 in_env=True
  epoch  9: mse=0.00008 | rand=24.78% nat=28.64% | alpha=0.0256 | dev=0.0039 in_env=True
  epoch 10: mse=0.00007 | rand=43.96% nat=46.96% | alpha=0.0258 | dev=0.0041 in_env=True
  epoch 11: mse=0.00006 | rand=53.64% nat=54.76% | alpha=0.0260 | dev=0.0041 in_env=True
  epoch 12: mse=0.00005 | rand=47.99% nat=48.25% | alpha=0.0263 | dev=0.0039 in_env=True
  epoch 13: mse=0.00004 | rand=36.85% nat=40.04% | alpha=0.0265 | dev=0.0036 in_env=True
  epoch 14: mse=0.00004 | rand=65.54% nat=68.46% | alpha=0.0267 | dev=0.0035 in_env=True
  epoch 15: mse=0.00003 | rand=89.39% nat=92.22% | alpha=0.0269 | dev=0.0034 in_env=True
  epoch 16: mse=0.00003 | rand=42.52% nat=44.34% | alpha=0.0270 | dev=0.0033 in_env=True
  epoch 17: mse=0.00002 | rand=79.55% nat=83.27% | alpha=0.0272 | dev=0.0033 in_env=True
  epoch 18: mse=0.00002 | rand=66.53% nat=69.91% | alpha=0.0273 | dev=0.0032 in_env=True
  epoch 19: mse=0.00002 | rand=42.65% nat=42.95% | alpha=0.0274 | dev=0.0031 in_env=True
  epoch 20: mse=0.00001 | rand=94.95% nat=96.85% | alpha=0.0275 | dev=0.0030 in_env=True
  epoch 21: mse=0.00001 | rand=62.79% nat=65.49% | alpha=0.0276 | dev=0.0031 in_env=True
  epoch 22: mse=0.00001 | rand=97.06% nat=98.77% | alpha=0.0276 | dev=0.0031 in_env=True
  epoch 23: mse=0.00001 | rand=93.82% nat=95.22% | alpha=0.0276 | dev=0.0030 in_env=True
  epoch 24: mse=0.00001 | rand=97.94% nat=99.36% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0029 in_env=True
  epoch 25: mse=0.00000 | rand=95.35% nat=96.22% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0029 in_env=True
  epoch 26: mse=0.00000 | rand=98.93% nat=99.65% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0029 in_env=True
  epoch 27: mse=0.00000 | rand=98.65% nat=99.59% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0029 in_env=True
  epoch 28: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.18% nat=99.65% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 29: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.27% nat=99.85% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 30: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.31% nat=99.69% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 31: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.43% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 32: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.47% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 33: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.51% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 34: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.54% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0028 in_env=True
  epoch 35: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.56% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0027 in_env=True
  epoch 36: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.58% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0027 in_env=True
  epoch 37: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.59% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0027 in_env=True
  epoch 38: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.60% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0027 in_env=True
  epoch 39: mse=0.00000 | rand=99.60% nat=100.00% | alpha=0.0277 | dev=0.0027 in_env=True
  best byte recovery: 99.60% | checkpoint: geolip_svae_transformer_results/geolip_svae_transformer.pt
  adjudication (text -> model -> text):
    'the cat sat on the mat' -> 'the cat sat on the mat'
    'machine learning' -> 'machine learning'
    'hello world' -> 'hello world'

Will need to attach unrelated data for recon testing to increase the nat difficulty. It's too easy.

Alright I hooked up Trelis/tiny-shakespeare for independent eval.